首页> 外文期刊>Brookings Papers on Economic Activity >Deciphering the Fail and Rise in the Net Capital Share: Accumulation or Scarcity?
【24h】

Deciphering the Fail and Rise in the Net Capital Share: Accumulation or Scarcity?

机译:解释净资本份额的失败和增加:积累还是稀缺?

获取原文
       

摘要

In the postwar era, developed economies have experienced two substantial trends in the net capital share of aggregate income: a rise during the last several decades, which is well known, and a fall of comparable magnitude that continued until the 1970s, which is less well known. Overall, the net capital share has increased since 1948, but once disaggregated this increase turns out to come entirely from the housing sector: the contribution to net capital income from all other sectors has been zero or slightly negative, as the fall and rise have offset each other. Several influential accounts of the recent rise emphasize the role of increased capital accumulation, but this view is at odds with theory and evidence: it requires empirically improbable elasticities of substitution, and it presumes a correlation between the capital-income ratio and capital share that is not visible in the data. A more limited narrative that stresses scarcity and the increased cost of housing better fits the data. These results are clarified using a new, multisector model of factor shares.
机译:在战后时代,发达经济体在总收入中所占的净资本份额经历了两个重大趋势:在过去的几十年中有所上升,这是众所周知的;而在相当程度上一直下降到1970年代,下降幅度较小。众所周知。总体而言,自1948年以来,净资本份额一直在增​​加,但从总体上看,这种增长完全来自住房部门:所有其他部门对净资本收入的贡献为零或略微为负,因为下降和上升已被抵消。彼此。关于近期崛起的几个有影响力的解释都强调了增加资本积累的作用,但是这种观点与理论和证据相矛盾:它需要经验上不可能的替代弹性,并且假定资本收入比率与资本份额之间存在相关性,即在数据中不可见。强调稀缺性和住房成本增加的叙述更为有限,更适合数据。使用新的多部门要素份额模型可以澄清这些结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号