首页> 外文期刊>Brookings Papers on Economic Activity >Lower Oil Prices and the US Economy: Is This Time Different?
【24h】

Lower Oil Prices and the US Economy: Is This Time Different?

机译:较低的石油价格和美国经济:这次不同吗?

获取原文
       

摘要

We explore the effect of the sharp and sustained decline after June 2014 in the global price of crude oil (and hence in the U.S. price of gasoline) on U.S. real GDP growth. Our analysis suggests that this decline produced a cumulative stimulus of about 0.9 percent of real GDP by raising private real consumption and non-oil-related business investment, and an additional stimulus of 0.04 percent, reflecting a shrinking petroleum trade deficit. This stimulative effect, however, has been largely offset by a large reduction in real investment by the oil sector. Hence, the net stimulus since June 2014 has been close to zero. We show that the U.S. economy's response was not fundamentally different from that observed after the oil price decline of 1986. Then as now, the U.S. economy's response is consistent with standard economic models of the transmission of oil price shocks. We find no evidence that frictions in reallocating capital and labor across sectors or increased uncertainty about the price of gasoline explain the sluggish response of U.S. real GDP growth. Nor do we find evidence of financial contagion, of spillovers from oil-related investment to non-oil-related investment, of an increase in household savings, or of households deleveraging.
机译:我们研究了2014年6月以后全球原油价格(以及美国汽油价格)急剧且持续下跌对美国实际GDP增长的影响。我们的分析表明,这一下降通过提高私人实际消费和与石油无关的商业投资,产生了约0.9%的实际GDP累计刺激,以及0.04%的额外刺激,反映了石油贸易赤字的减少。但是,这种刺激作用已被石油部门实际投资的大幅度减少所抵消。因此,自2014年6月以来的净刺激措施已接近于零。我们表明,美国经济的反应与1986年油价下跌后观察到的反应没有本质上的区别。然后,到现在为止,美国经济的反应与油价冲击传递的标准经济模型是一致的。我们找不到证据表明跨部门重新分配资本和劳动力方面的摩擦或汽油价格不确定性的增加解释了美国实际GDP增长的反应迟钝。我们也没有发现金融危机蔓延,从石油相关投资向非石油相关投资的溢出,家庭储蓄增加或家庭去杠杆化的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号