【24h】

Common Sense

机译:常识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Let's get real here. The FCC is not going to get rid of the must-carry rules. Cable operators are still going to have to put TV stations on a must-buy tier, and there are still going to be some cases where broadcasters and cable operators can't come to terms on contracts, just as there is in virtually any category of negotiation. And sorry, in those cases, which as the National Association of Broadcasters points out are the exception rather than the rule, losing access to a TV station signal is not the equivalent of cutting a lifeline—so long as the FCC leaves enough stations around after its spectrum reclamation push. But with its vow to be a more consumer-focused agency, and the pressure from Congress to do something in response to a few high-profile retrans impasses, the FCC is going to take some action. It is under pressure to do so before the end of this year, which is when a bunch of retrans deals come up for renewal.
机译:让我们在这里变得真实。 FCC不会摆脱必须遵守的规则。有线电视运营商仍将电视台置于必须购买的等级,并且在某些情况下,广播公司和有线电视运营商仍无法达成合同,就像几乎任何类别的谈判。抱歉,在这种情况下,正如国家广播电视协会所指出的那样,这是例外而不是规则,失去对电视台信号的访问不等于缩短生命线-只要FCC在此之后留下足够的电视台它的频谱回收推动。但是,由于它誓言要成为一个以消费者为中心的代理机构,并且国会迫切需要采取一些措施来应对一些备受瞩目的转售僵局,因此FCC将采取一些行动。在今年年底之前,这样做是有压力的,那是一大堆重新交易要续签的时候。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Broadcasting & Cable》 |2011年第23期|p.32|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:17:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号