首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Primary care in the accident and emergency department: Ⅰ. Prospective identification of patients
【24h】

Primary care in the accident and emergency department: Ⅰ. Prospective identification of patients

机译:急诊科的基础护理:Ⅰ。前瞻性鉴定患者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective—To compare patient characteristics and consultation activities for attenders at accident and emergency departments assessed by nurse triage as presenting with "primary care" or "accident and emergency" type problems. Design—One year prospective study. Setting—A busy, inner city accident and emergency department in south London. Subjects—Of the 5658 patients treated for new problems during a stratified random sample of 204 three hour sessions between 10 am and 9 pm during June 1989 to May 1990, all "primary care" (2065 patients) and a 10% random sample of "accident and emergency" (291 patients) were included in the analysis. Main outcome measures—Patient's age, sex, duration of presenting problem, diagnosis, laboratory and radiographic investigations, treatments, and referrals. Results—40.9% of attenders with new problems were classified by triage as presenting with "primary care" problems (95% confidence interval 39.6% to 42-2%). Primary care attenders were more likely than accident and emergency patients to be young adults, to have symptoms with a duration of longer than 24 hours, and to present problems not related to injury (all P < 0.001). Accident and emergency patients were considerably more likely to be referred to on call teams and to be admitted. Even so, 9.7% of primary care patients were referred to on call teams and a further 8.9% were referred to the fracture clinic or advised to return to the accident and emergency department for follow up. Conclusion—Accident and emergency triage can be developed to identify patients with problems that are more likely to be of a primary care type, and these patients are less likely to receive an investigation, minor surgical procedure, or referral. Many patients in this category, however, receive interventions likely to support their decision to attend accident and emergency rather than general practice. This may reflect limitations in the sensitivity of triage practice or a clinical approach of junior medical staff that includes a propensity to intervene.
机译:目的-比较由护士分类进行评估的急诊科或急诊科就诊的患者特征和咨询活动,这些患者表现为“初级保健”或“急诊”类型的问题。设计-一年的前瞻性研究。设置-伦敦南部繁忙的市区内紧急事故处理部门。受试者-在1989年6月至1990年5月的上午10点至晚上9点之间的204个三小时疗程的分层随机样本中,对5658例接受新问题治疗的患者中,所有“初级保健”(2065例患者)和10%的“分析中包括“意外和紧急情况”(291例患者)。主要结果指标-患者的年龄,性别,出现问题的持续时间,诊断,实验室和射线照相调查,治疗以及转诊。结果-有40.9%的新问题参加者通过分类被分类为“初级保健”问题(95%置信区间为39.6%至42-2%)。与意外事故和急诊患者相比,初级保健服务人员更可能是年轻人,症状持续时间超过24小时,并且呈现出与伤害无关的问题(所有P <0.001)。事故和急诊患者更有可能被转诊到电话团队并被接纳。即便如此,仍有9.7%的初级保健患者被转诊给了电话团队,还有8.9%的患者被转诊至骨折诊所或被建议返回事故急诊室进行随访。结论—可以进行事故和急诊分类,以识别出更有可能属于初级保健类型的问题的患者,而这些患者接受调查,较小的外科手术或转诊的可能性较小。但是,许多此类患者接受的干预措施可能会支持他们决定参加事故和紧急情况的决定,而不是一般做法。这可能反映了分诊实践的敏感性或初级医务人员的临床方法(包括干预倾向)的局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号