首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Misconduct in research: editors respond
【24h】

Misconduct in research: editors respond

机译:研究不当:编辑回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Misconduct in research momentarily rose high up the agenda of the British medical community after Malcolm Pearce, an obstetrician and gynaecologist, was found in 1995 to have forged a series of papers. The case made the front pages of the newspapers and led to the downfall of a president of a royal college. Despite calls for action on research misconduct, the issue has not been tackled. Now Britain has another high profile case, and perhaps me profession will be awakened from its torpor. In the meantime, editors-who are regularly confronted by cases of possible misconduct-have decided to help themselves. We have set up the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
机译:在1995年发现妇产科和妇科医师Malcolm Pearce伪造了一系列论文之后,研究不端行为立即成为英国医学界关注的焦点。此案成为报纸的头版新闻,并导致一所皇家学院院长的垮台。尽管呼吁就研究不当行为采取行动,但这一问题尚未得到解决。现在,英国又有一个备受瞩目的案子,也许我的职业将被它的骚动唤醒。同时,经常遇到可能的不当行为的编辑们决定自助。我们成立了出版道德委员会(COPE)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号