...
首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >The effect of deprivation on variations in general practitioners' referral rates: a cross sectional study of computerised data on new medical and surgical outpatient referrals in Nottinghamshire
【24h】

The effect of deprivation on variations in general practitioners' referral rates: a cross sectional study of computerised data on new medical and surgical outpatient referrals in Nottinghamshire

机译:剥夺对全科医生转诊率变化的影响:诺丁汉郡新医学和外科门诊转诊计算机数据的横断面研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To determine the effect of deprivation on variations in general practitioners' referral rates using the Jarman underprivileged area (UPA(8)) score as a proxy measure. Design: Cross sectional survey of new medical and surgical referrals from general practices to hospitals (determined from hospital activity data). Setting: All of the 183 general practices in Nottinghamshire and all of the 19 hospitals in Trent region. Main outcome measures: The relation between the referral rates per 1000 registered patients and the practice population's UPA(8) score (calculated on the basis of electoral ward), with adjustment for the number of partners, percentage of patients aged over 65 years, and fundholding status of each practice. Results: There was a significant independent association between deprivation, as measured by the UPA(8) score, and high total referral rates and high medical referral rates (P < 0.0001). The UPA(8) score alone explained 23% of the total variation in total referral rates and 32% of the variation in medical referral rates. On multivariate analysis, where partnership size, fundholding status, and percentage of men and women aged over 65 years were included, the UPA(8) score explained 29% and 35% of the variation in total and medical referral rates respectively. Conclusion: Of the variables studied, the UPA(8) score was the strongest predictor of variations in referral rates. This association is most likely to be through a link with morbidity, although it could reflect differences in patients' perceptions, doctors' behaviour, or the use and provision of services.
机译:目的:使用Jarman贫困地区(UPA(8))得分作为代理指标,确定剥夺对全科医生转诊率变化的影响。设计:从一般实践到医院的新医疗和外科转诊的横断面调查(由医院活动数据确定)。地点:诺丁汉郡的183种全科医疗以及特伦特地区的19家医院。主要结果衡量指标:每千名注册患者的推荐率与实践人群的UPA(8)得分(根据选举病房计算)之间的关系,并调整了陪伴人数,65岁以上患者的百分比以及每种做法的资金持有状况。结果:以UPA(8)评分衡量,剥夺与总转诊率高和医疗转诊率高之间存在显着的独立关联(P <0.0001)。仅UPA(8)得分就解释了总推荐率的23%和医疗推荐率的32%。在多变量分析中,其中包括了合伙人规模,资金持有状况以及65岁以上男女的百分比,UPA(8)评分分别解释了总推荐率和医疗推荐率的29%和35%。结论:在研究的变量中,UPA(8)得分是推荐率变化的最强预测因子。这种关联最有可能是与发病率相关的,尽管它可能反映出患者的看法,医生的行为或服务的使用和提供方面的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号