首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Doctors' knowledge about evidence based medicine terminology General practitioners may not know the jargon, but could use the knowledge
【24h】

Doctors' knowledge about evidence based medicine terminology General practitioners may not know the jargon, but could use the knowledge

机译:医生对循证医学术语的了解全科医生可能不了解专业术语,但可以使用这些知识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a report published in this issue (p 950) Australian general practitioners rated themselves and were then tested on their evidence based medicine skills. The results are not encouraging. Fifty general practitioners in Australia rated their understanding of seven common terms from evidence based medicine from "It would not be helpful for me to understand this term" to "I understand this and could explain it to others." On average, only 22% said they understood each term and could explain it to others. Worse still, in the subsequent structured interview only one general practitioner could provide a fully satisfactory explanation of any of the terms, and many of the explanations revealed considerable misunderstanding. The authors of the study argue that general practitioners need to understand these terms to practise evidence based medicine and that there is little good research on how this can be done. For those working in evidence based medicine these results make depressing reading.
机译:在本期发表的报告中(第950页),澳大利亚全科医生对其进行了评估,然后对其基于证据的医学技能进行了测试。结果并不令人鼓舞。在澳大利亚,有50名全科医生从“循证医学”对他们对七个常用术语的理解进行了等级评定,从“对我理解这个术语不会有帮助”到“我理解并可以向其他人解释”。平均而言,只有22%的人说他们理解每个术语并可以向其他人解释。更糟糕的是,在随后的结构化面试中,只有一名普通医生可以对任何术语提供完全令人满意的解释,而且许多解释都显示出相当大的误解。该研究的作者认为,全科医生需要理解这些术语才能实践循证医学,并且关于如何做到这一点的研究很少。对于那些从事循证医学工作的人来说,这些结果令人沮丧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号