首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Patients are experts in their own field
【24h】

Patients are experts in their own field

机译:患者是各自领域的专家

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The notion of being concerned with the interests of patients is not new. It is as old as medicine. What is new, or relatively new, is the question of how that concern is best dealt with. Who is the best judge of a patient's interests? For almost the whole of the history of modern medicine, this question was not asked because the need to ask it was not recognised. A patient's interests were best judged by the patient's doctor. That was part of what a doctor did. Patients knew nothing of clinical matters. How could they be expected to decide what was good for them? Indeed, it was cruel to impose such a burden?
机译:关注患者利益的观念并不是新事物。它和医学一样古老。什么是新问题,还是相对较新的问题,是如何最好地解决这一问题。谁是患者利益的最佳法官?几乎在整个现代医学史上,都没有问到这个问题,因为没有认识到问这个问题的必要性。病人的利益最好由病人的医生来判断。那是医生所做的一部分。患者对临床问题一无所知。如何期望他们决定对他们有什么好处?确实,施加这样的负担是残酷的吗?

著录项

  • 来源
    《British Medical Journal》 |2003年第7402期|p.1276|共1页
  • 作者

    Ian Kennedy;

  • 作者单位

    Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection, Department of Health, London;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医药、卫生;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:12:18

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号