首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey
【24h】

Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey

机译:根据患者对获取和连续性的观点制定标准:对全科医学评估调查数据的二次分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives To examine patients' views on access and continuity in general practice to derive quality standards. Design Secondary analysis of data from general practice research studies and routine quality assessment activities undertaken by practices and primary care trusts. Setting General practice. Participants General practice patients. Results Satisfactory standards of access were next day appointments with general practitioners and a 6-10 minute wait for consultations to begin. A satisfactory level of continuity was seeing the same general practitioner "a lot of the time." Standards varied with the analytic method used and by sociodemographic group. Conclusions Standards expected by patients in primary care can be derived from linked report-assessment pairs. Patients may have expectations of access that are in excess of government targets. Patients also have high expectations of continuity of care. It is unclear the degree to which such standards are reliable or valid, how conflicts between access and continuity should be resolved, or how these standards relate to other priorities of patients such as high quality interpersonal care.
机译:目的在一般实践中检查患者对获取和连续性的看法,以得出质量标准。设计由实践和基层医疗信托进行的一般实践研究和常规质量评估活动的数据的二级分析。设置一般做法。参与者全科患者。结果令人满意的访问标准是第二天与全科医生约诊,并等待6-10分钟开始咨询。令人满意的连续性水平是“很多时候”看到同一位全科医生。标准随所用分析方法和社会人口统计学组的不同而不同。结论初级保健患者期望的标准可以来自相关的报告评估对。患者可能期望获得超出政府目标的机会。患者对护理的连续性也抱有很高的期望。尚不清楚此类标准在何种程度上可靠或有效,应如何解决访问与连续性之间的冲突,或这些标准如何与患者的其他优先事项(例如高质量的人际关怀)相关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号