首页> 外文期刊>British Medical Journal >The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy
【24h】

The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy

机译:评估研究:两项平行的随机试验,一项比较腹腔镜与腹部子宫切除术,另一项比较腹腔镜与阴道子宫切除术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To compare the effects of laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in the abdominal trial, and laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy in the vaginal trial. Design Two parallel, multicentre, randomised trials. Setting 28 UK centres and two South African centres. Participants 1380 women were recruited; 1346 had surgery; 937 were followed up at one year. Primary outcome Rate of major complications. Results In the abdominal trial laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a higher rate of major complications than abdominal hysterectomy (11.1% v 6.2%, P = 0.02; difference 4.9%, 95% confidence interval 0.9% to 9.1%) and the number needed to treat to harm was 20. Laparoscopic hysterectomy also took longer to perform (84 minutes v 50 minutes) hut was less painful (visual analogue scale 3.51 v 3.88, P = 0.01) and resulted in a shorter stay in hospital after the operation (3 days v 4 days). Six weeks after the operation, laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with less pain and better quality of life than abdominal hysterectomy (SF-12, body image scale, and sexual activity questionnaires). In the vaginal trial we found no evidence of a difference in major complication rates between laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy (9.8% v 9.5%, P = 0.92; difference 0.3%, - 5.2% to 5.8%), and the number needed to treat to harm was 333. We found no evidence of other differences between laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy except that laparoscopic hysterectomy took longer to perform (72 minutes v 39 minutes) and was associated with a higher rate of detecting unexpected pathology (16.4% v 4.8%, P = < 0.01). However, this trial was underpowered. Conclusions Laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a significantly higher rate of major complications than abdominal hysterectomy. It also took longer to perform but was associated with less pain, quicker recovery, and better short term quality of life. The trial comparing vaginal hysterectomy with laparoscopic hysterectomy was underpowered and is inconclusive on the rate of major complications; however, vaginal hysterectomy took less time.
机译:目的比较腹腔镜子宫切除术和腹部子宫切除术在腹部试验中的效果,以及腹腔镜子宫切除术和阴道子宫切除术在阴道试验中的效果。设计两个平行,多中心,随机试验。在英国设有28个中心和两个南非中心。共有1380名妇女参加了招募。 1346年动手术;一年随访937例。主要结果主要并发症发生率。结果在腹部试验中,腹腔镜子宫切除术的主要并发症发生率高于腹部子宫切除术(11.1%对6.2%,P = 0.02;差异4.9%,95%置信区间0.9%至9.1%)和需要治疗的次数造成的伤害为20。腹腔镜子宫切除术花费的时间也更长(84分钟v 50分钟),但小屋的疼痛感也较小(视觉模拟评分表3.51 v 3.88,P = 0.01),导致手术后住院时间较短(3天v 4天)。手术后六周,腹腔镜子宫切除术比腹部子宫切除术(SF-12,身体影像量表和性活动问卷)具有更少的疼痛感和更好的生活质量。在阴道试验中,我们发现没有证据表明腹腔镜子宫切除术和阴道子宫切除术之间的主要并发症发生率存在差异(9.8%v 9.5%,P = 0.92;差异0.3%,-5.2%至5.8%),以及需要治疗的数字伤害为333。我们没有发现腹腔镜子宫切除术和阴道子宫切除术之间存在其他差异的证据,只是腹腔镜子宫切除术需要更长的时间(72分钟对39分钟)并且与发现意外病理的比率更高(16.4%对4.8%)有关。 ,P = <0.01)。但是,该审判的权力不足。结论腹腔镜子宫切除术的主要并发症发生率明显高于腹部子宫切除术。它的执行时间也更长,但疼痛更少,恢复更快,短期生活质量更高。比较阴道子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫切除术的试验动力不足,并且在主要并发症发生率方面尚无定论。但是,阴道子宫切除术花费的时间更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号