首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy
【2h】

The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy

机译:评估研究:两项平行的随机试验一项比较腹腔镜与腹部子宫切除术另一项比较腹腔镜与阴道子宫切除术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To compare the effects of laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in the abdominal trial, and laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy in the vaginal trial.>Design Two parallel, multicentre, randomised trials.>Setting 28 UK centres and two South African centres.>Participants 1380 women were recruited; 1346 had surgery; 937 were followed up at one year.>Primary outcome Rate of major complications.>Results In the abdominal trial laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a higher rate of major complications than abdominal hysterectomy (11.1% v 6.2%, P = 0.02; difference 4.9%, 95% confidence interval 0.9% to 9.1%) and the number needed to treat to harm was 20. Laparoscopic hysterectomy also took longer to perform (84 minutes v 50 minutes) but was less painful (visual analogue scale 3.51 v 3.88, P = 0.01) and resulted in a shorter stay in hospital after the operation (3 days v 4 days). Six weeks after the operation, laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with less pain and better quality of life than abdominal hysterectomy (SF-12, body image scale, and sexual activity questionnaires).In the vaginal trial we found no evidence of a difference in major complication rates between laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy (9.8% v 9.5%, P = 0.92; difference 0.3%, -5.2% to 5.8%), and the number needed to treat to harm was 333. We found no evidence of other differences between laparoscopic hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy except that laparoscopic hysterectomy took longer to perform (72 minutes v 39 minutes) and was associated with a higher rate of detecting unexpected pathology (16.4% v 4.8%, P = < 0.01). However, this trial was underpowered.>Conclusions Laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with a significantly higher rate of major complications than abdominal hysterectomy. It also took longer to perform but was associated with less pain, quicker recovery, and better short term quality of life. The trial comparing vaginal hysterectomy with laparoscopic hysterectomy was underpowered and is inconclusive on the rate of major complications; however, vaginal hysterectomy took less time.
机译:>目的比较腹腔镜子宫切除术和腹部子宫切除术在腹部试验中的效果,以及腹腔镜子宫切除术和阴道子宫切除术在阴道试验中的效果。>设计两项平行,多中心,随机试验。 >设置英国的28个中心和两个南非的中心。>参与者招募了1380名女性; 1346年动手术;一年随访937例。>主要结果主要并发症发生率。>结果在腹部试验中,腹腔镜子宫切除术的主要并发症发生率高于腹部子宫切除术(11.1) %v 6.2%,P = 0.02;差异4.9%,95%置信区间0.9%至9.1%),需要治疗的伤害数量为20。腹腔镜子宫切除术也花费了更长的时间(84分钟v 50分钟),但是疼痛减轻(视觉模拟评分表3.51对3.88,P = 0.01),并导致术后住院时间缩短(3天对4天)。术后六周,腹腔镜子宫切除术比腹部子宫切除术(SF-12,身体图像量表和性活动问卷)具有更少的疼痛感和更好的生活质量。在阴道试验中,我们没有发现重大并发症差异的证据腹腔镜子宫切除术和阴道子宫切除术之间的比率(9.8%vs 9.5%,P = 0.92;差异0.3%,-5.2%至5.8%),并且需要伤害的数字为333。我们没有发现其他证据表明腹腔镜手术之间存在其他差异子宫切除术和阴道子宫切除术的区别在于腹腔镜子宫切除术花费的时间更长(72分钟对39分钟),并且与发现意外病理的比率更高(16.4%对4.8%,P = <0.01)。但是,该试验的动力不足。>结论。腹腔镜子宫切除术的主要并发症发生率明显高于腹部子宫切除术。它的执行时间也更长,但疼痛更少,恢复更快,短期生活质量更高。比较阴道子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫切除术的试验动力不足,并且在主要并发症发生率方面尚无定论。但是,阴道子宫切除术花费的时间更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号