首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Management >The Safeguarding Effect of Governance Mechanisms in Inter-firm Exchange: The Decisive Role of Mutual Opportunism
【24h】

The Safeguarding Effect of Governance Mechanisms in Inter-firm Exchange: The Decisive Role of Mutual Opportunism

机译:公司间交换中治理机制的保障作用:机会主义的决定性作用

获取原文
           

摘要

This study empirically investigates the safeguarding effect of (1) administrative control, (2) a dominant power position and (3) relational norms, on opportunistic behaviour of suppliers, by means of a survey among 624 information and communication technology professionals in Dutch municipalities. The findings indicate that individual effectiveness of relational norms, particularly in terms of flexibility and solidarity, was most prominent. Administrative control and power did not show a significant impact on supplier opportunism in our sample. Research into the simultaneous use of several safeguards against opportunism generated the finding that different relational norms fortify each other's safeguarding effect. Furthermore, we demonstrate that supplier opportunism is only mitigated by a dominant power position when the buyer does not exploit its favourable position and the buyer does not behave opportunistically. Hence, power seems to have a safeguarding effect only when it is not used.
机译:本研究通过对荷兰市政当局的624名信息和通信技术专业人员进行调查,调查了(1)行政控制,(2)主导权地位和(3)关系规范对供应商机会主义行为的保护作用。研究结果表明,关系规范的个体有效性最为显着,特别是在灵活性和团结方面。在我们的样本中,行政控制和权力对供应商机会主义没有显着影响。对同时使用多种防止机会主义的保障措施的研究产生了这样的发现,即不同的关系规范加强了彼此的保障作用。此外,我们证明,只有当买方没有利用自己的有利地位并且买方没有采取投机取巧的行为时,供应商的机会主义才会被主导的权力地位所缓解。因此,电源似乎只有在不使用时才具有保护作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号