首页> 外文期刊>Breast Cancer Research and Treatment >High prognostic significance of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study in 710 patients with operable breast cancer
【24h】

High prognostic significance of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study in 710 patients with operable breast cancer

机译:新辅助化疗后残留疾病的高预后意义:710例可手术性乳腺癌患者的回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prognostic factors are used to help clinical decision-making in selecting the appropriate treatment for individual patients. The purpose of this retrospective study was to identify one or more factors associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), in 710 patients with operable breast cancer, subjected to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, radiotherapy and adjuvant treatments. At a median follow-up of 7.6 years, univariate analysis showed that pathological complete response (pCR) was significantly related to survival (p < 0.003), as well as accepted prognostic factors, as SBR and MSBR grades, hormonal receptors or node involvement at surgery, who remained significant in our study (p < 0.001). The revised Nottingham prognostic index (NPI) and related indices (BGI, MNPI and MBGI) were also significantly associated to survival (p < 0.003). In multivariate analysis, node involvement and MSBR grade remained prognostic factors for OS and DFS (p < 0.0003 and p < 0.02, respectively). The MNPI and pCR were significantly related with OS (p = 0.04) and pts with hormonal receptor-positive tumours had a better DFS than others (p = 0.004). Among all clinical and pathological parameters, axillary dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is still important to determine node involvement, a major prognostic factor. Moreover, MSBR grade seemed to be more accurate and predictive of long-term outcome than the standard SBR grade. It is concluded that, outside any other ‘biological’ factor, residual disease in breast and nodes must be strongly considered after an induction chemotherapy so as to choose adjuvant treatment for the individual patient.
机译:预后因素可帮助临床决策为个别患者选择合适的治疗方法。这项回顾性研究的目的是在710例可手术的乳腺癌患者中,接受新辅助化疗,手术,放疗和辅助治疗后,确定与总生存(OS)和无病生存(DFS)相关的一个或多个因素。在7.6年的中位随访中,单因素分析显示病理完全缓解(pCR)与生存率(p <0.003)以及公认的预后因素(如SBR和MSBR等级,激素受体或结节受累)显着相关。手术,在我们的研究中仍然很重要(p <0.001)。修订的诺丁汉预后指数(NPI)和相关指数(BGI,MNPI和MBGI)也与生存率显着相关(p <0.003)。在多变量分析中,结节受累和MSBR分级仍然是OS和DFS的预后因素(分别为p <0.0003和p <0.02)。 MNPI和pCR与OS显着相关(p = 0.04),荷尔蒙受体阳性肿瘤的pts的DFS优于其他患者(p = 0.004)。在所有临床和病理学参数中,新辅助化疗后的腋窝淋巴结清扫对于确定淋巴结受累仍是重要的,淋巴结受累是主要的预后因素。而且,MSBR级似乎比标准SBR级更准确和可预测长期结果。结论是,在任何其他“生物学”因素之外,在诱导化疗后必须强烈考虑乳房和淋巴结的残留疾病,以便为每个患者选择辅助治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号