首页> 外文期刊>Boston College environmental affairs law review >NEPA AND THE ROAN PLATEAU: FORCING THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT TO TAKE A HARD LOOK
【24h】

NEPA AND THE ROAN PLATEAU: FORCING THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT TO TAKE A HARD LOOK

机译:NEPA和ROAN PLATEAU:强制土地管理局采取严峻措施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In 2007, the Bureau of Land Management adopted a resource management plan that essentially made all public land within the Roan Plateau Planning Area available for leasing to private oil and gas entities. Environmental groups alleged that the BLM, in adopting the plan, failed to satisfy the National Environmental Policy Act's procedural requirements. In Colorado Environmental Coalition v. Salazar, the district court held that the BLM violated NEPA by failing to adequately consider the plan's cumulative air quality effects. On remand, the court did not offer the agency any instructions in curing the procedural deficiency. The court's lack of guidance on remand is consistent with the Tenth Circuit's refusal to equate NEPA's procedural requirements with the production of hard data. This Comment argues that the Ninth Circuit's application of NEPA , better promotes the Act's underlying policies of public awareness and informed decisionmaking without imposing an undue burden on federal agencies.
机译:2007年,土地管理局通过了一项资源管理计划,该计划实际上使罗恩高原规划区内的所有公共土地都可以租赁给私人石油和天然气实体。环保组织声称,BLM在采用该计划时未满足《国家环境政策法案》的程序要求。在Colorado Environmental Coalition诉Salazar一案中,地方法院裁定BLM未能充分考虑该计划对空气质量的累积影响而违反了NEPA。退还后,法院未向该机构提供任何纠正程序缺陷的指示。法院缺乏关于还押的指导意见,这与第十巡回法院拒绝将NEPA的程序要求等同于产生硬数据相一致。该意见认为,第九巡回法院对NEPA的适用,可以更好地促进该法案的公众意识和知情决策的基本政策,而不会给联邦机构造成不必要的负担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号