首页> 外文期刊>Biotechnology Law Report >The Olanzapine Patent Dispute: German Court Grants a Preliminary Injunction on a Patent Invalidated by the First-Instance Federal Patent Court
【24h】

The Olanzapine Patent Dispute: German Court Grants a Preliminary Injunction on a Patent Invalidated by the First-Instance Federal Patent Court

机译:奥氮平专利纠纷:德国法院对一审联邦专利法院无效的专利授予初步禁令

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The recent olanzapine case has caused a furor in Germany. For the first time in history, a German court allowed a preliminary injunction based on a patent that was found invalid by the first-instance Federal Patent Court. The olanzapine patent (DE 691 12 895), owned by Eli Lilly, was attacked by several generics companies filing invalidation complaints with the Federal Patent Court. By decision 3Ni 21/04 (EU) combined with 3Ni 41/06 (EU), the Court declared the olanzapine patent invalid for lack of novelty. Nevertheless, the patentee filed a request for a preliminary injunction inter alia with the first-instance Civil Court in Düsseldorf, which rejected the request; surprisingly, however, the second-instance Appeal Court granted the preliminary injunction. This is all the more noteworthy in that the infringement court of second instance, composed of “non-technical” judges, found the underlying patent to be valid, contrary to the opinion of the Federal Patent Court when technical judges had decided the case.
机译:最近的奥氮平案件在德国引起了轩然大波。德国法院有史以来第一次允许基于一审联邦专利法院认为无效的专利作出初步禁令。礼来公司拥有的奥氮平专利(DE 691 12 895)受到多家仿制药公司的攻击,这些公司向联邦专利法院提起无效诉讼。法院在第3Ni 21/04(EU)号决定和第3Ni 41/06(EU)号决定中,宣布奥氮平专利由于缺乏新颖性而无效。然而,专利权人向杜塞尔多夫一审民事法院提出了初步禁令的请求,该法院驳回了该请求;然而,令人惊讶的是,二审上诉法院批准了初步禁令。更为值得注意的是,由“非技术”法官组成的第二审侵权法院认为基础专利是有效的,这与联邦专利法院在技术法官作出裁决时的观点相反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号