首页> 外文期刊>Biologia Plantarum >Comparison Between Different Methods for Measuring Transpiration in Potted Apple Trees
【24h】

Comparison Between Different Methods for Measuring Transpiration in Potted Apple Trees

机译:盆栽苹果不同蒸腾方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Five different methods for measuring transpiration, which include gravimetric analysis (control), heat pulse velocity (HPV), time domain reflectometry (TDR), single leaf and whole plant infrared gas-exchange measurements, have been tested on two cultivars (Redcort and Empire) of young apple trees (Malus communis L.). The objective was to compare these methods and establish the most affordable one to be used in greenhouse conditions in order to determine and/or estimate the amount of water for an efficient irrigation management. Results obtained with TDR were particularly accurate and not statistically different with respect to the control (−4.2 %) and this was supported by the correlation coefficient (r = 0.94) found. The HPV method was sufficiently accurate and reliable for small stems, however, in our conditions this method generally underestimated the transpiration (−32.4 %). Single leaf and particularly whole plant infrared gas-exchange measurements suffered an overestimation of the transpiration with respect to the control.
机译:已经在两个品种(雷德科特和帝国)上测试了五种不同的蒸腾速率测量方法,包括重量分析(对照),热脉冲速度(HPV),时域反射法(TDR),单叶和整株红外气体交换测量。苹果树(Malus communis L.)。目的是比较这些方法,并确定在温室条件下使用的最经济的方法,以便确定和/或估算有效灌溉管理所需的水量。用TDR获得的结果特别准确,相对于对照没有统计学差异(-4.2%),这得到了相关系数(r = 0.94)的支持。 HPV方法对于小茎足够准确和可靠,但是,在我们的条件下,该方法通常低估了蒸腾作用(-32.4%)。单叶,尤其是整株植物的红外气体交换测量值相对于对照而言,蒸腾作用被高估了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号