首页> 外文期刊>Biology and Fertility of Soils >An improved nitrogen difference method for estimating biological nitrogen fixation in legume-based intercropping systems
【24h】

An improved nitrogen difference method for estimating biological nitrogen fixation in legume-based intercropping systems

机译:一种改进的氮差异法估算豆类间作系统中生物固氮能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The nitrogen difference method (NDM) for quantifying N2 fixation, based on the same amount of soil N exploited by N2-fixing and non-N2-fixing plant, may not be suitable to plants with different root traits. We tested the reliability of NDM in legume-based intercropping systems by two field experiments in Northwest China. In experiment 1, faba bean (Vicia faba), pea (Pisum sativum), and soybean (Glycine max) grew solely or intercropped with maize (Zea mays) with two N application rates (0, 225 kg ha−1). The biomass of faba bean, pea, and maize was significantly increased, whereas that of soybean was decreased when intercropped than solely grown. Aggressivity analyses demonstrate greater N competition ability of faba bean and pea, but not soybean, than maize. An improved NDM (INDM) could mitigate these effects: , where x and 1 − x are planting area of legume and non-legume in the intercropping system. Compared to traditional NDM (TNDM, ), %N dfa (N derived from air) by INDM was decreased by 54.3% and 39.8% for faba bean, 44.7% and 5.0% for pea, but increased by 113.5% and 191.0% for soybean at the two N application rates, indicating different %N dfa quantifications between the two methods. In experiment 2, %N dfa of sole or intercropped faba bean was quantified by TNDM, INDM, and 15N natural abundance method (NA). The %N dfa only by INDM correlated significantly with that from NA. Both interspecific root interactions and N loss affect %N dfa estimation. Our results suggested that INDM could be more suitable than TNDM for quantifying %N dfa of a N2-fixing plant in intercropping systems.
机译:基于N 2 固定和非N 2 <固定的相同量土壤N的氮差异法(NDM),用于量化N 2 固定。 / sub-fixing植物,可能不适合具有不同根性状的植物。我们通过西北地区的两次野外试验,在基于豆类的间作系统中测试了NDM的可靠性。在实验1中,蚕豆(豌豆(Vicia faba),豌豆(Pisum sativum)和大豆(Glycine max))单独生长或与玉米(Zea mays)间作,两种氮肥施用量分别为(0,225 kg ha -1 < / sup>)。间作比单独种植时,蚕豆,豌豆和玉米的生物量显着增加,而大豆的生物量则下降。侵略性分析表明,蚕豆和豌豆(而非大豆)的氮竞争能力高于玉米。改进的NDM(INDM)可以减轻以下影响:其中,x和1-x是间作系统中豆类和非豆类的种植面积。与传统的NDM(TNDM,)相比,INDM的%N dfa (来自空气的氮)对蚕豆减少了54.3%和39.8%,对豌豆减少了44.7%和5.0%,但增加了在两种氮肥施用量下,大豆的含量分别为113.5%和191.0%,表明两种方法之间的%N dfa 定量不同。在实验2中,通过TNDM,INDM和 15 N自然丰度法(NA)定量了单一或间作蚕豆的%N dfa 。仅INDM的%N dfa 与NA的显着相关。种间根相互作用和氮损失都影响%N dfa 估计。我们的结果表明,在间作系统中,INDM比TNDM更适合定量N 2 固定植物的%N dfa

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号