...
首页> 外文期刊>Bioinformatics >The effects of probe binding affinity differences on gene expression measurements and how to deal with them
【24h】

The effects of probe binding affinity differences on gene expression measurements and how to deal with them

机译:探针结合亲和力差异对基因表达测量的影响以及如何处理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Motivation: When comparing gene expression levels between species or strains using microarrays, sequence differences between the groups can cause false identification of expression differences. Our simulated dataset shows that a sequence divergence of only 1% between species can lead to falsely reported expression differences for 50% of the transcripts—similar levels of effect have been reported previously in comparisons of human and chimpanzee expression. We propose a method for identifying probes that cause such false readings, using only the microarray data, so that problematic probes can be excluded from analysis. We then test the power of the method to detect sequence differences and to correct for falsely reported expression differences. Our method can detect 70% of the probes with sequence differences using human and chimpanzee data, while removing only 18% of probes with no sequence differences. Although only 70% of the probes with sequence differences are detected, the effect of removing probes on falsely reported expression differences is more dramatic: the method can remove 98% of the falsely reported expression differences from a simulated dataset. We argue that the method should be used even when sequence data are available.
机译:动机:使用微阵列比较物种或品系之间的基因表达水平时,各组之间的序列差异可能导致对表达差异的错误识别。我们的模拟数据集显示,物种之间仅1%的序列差异会导致错误报告超过50%的转录本的表达差异-先前已在人类和黑猩猩表达的比较中报道了相似的作用水平。我们提出了一种仅使用微阵列数据来识别导致此类错误读数的探针的方法,从而可以将有问题的探针排除在分析之外。然后,我们测试该方法的功能,以检测序列差异并纠正错误报告的表达差异。我们的方法可以使用人和黑猩猩的数据检测到70%具有序列差异的探针,而仅去除18%没有序列差异的探针。尽管仅检测到70%具有序列差异的探针,但是删除探针对错误报告的表达差异的影响更为显着:该方法可以从模拟数据集中消除98%错误报告的表达差异。我们认为即使序列数据可用,也应使用该方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Bioinformatics》 |2009年第21期|p.2772-2779|共8页
  • 作者单位

    1 Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany, 2 Departments of Integrative Biology and Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA and 3 Partner Institute for Computational Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yue Yang Road, Shanghai, 200031, P.R. China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号