...
首页> 外文期刊>Biodiversity and Conservation >Plantations of exotic tree species in Britain: irrelevant for biodiversity or novel habitat for native species?
【24h】

Plantations of exotic tree species in Britain: irrelevant for biodiversity or novel habitat for native species?

机译:英国的外来树种人工林:与生物多样性无关或与本土物种的新栖息地无关?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Novel or emergent ecosystems arising from human action present both threats and opportunities for biodiversity. It has been suggested that exotic species can “facilitate” or “inhibit” native biodiversity through habitat modification. In Britain, there is a discussion over the contribution to biodiversity of plantations of exotic conifer species as these are commonly thought to have little relevancy as a habitat for native biodiversity. To address this we compared the species richness of a range of different taxonomic groups (lichens, bryophytes, fungi, vascular plants, invertebrates and songbirds) in exotic and native forest stands of differing structural stages in northern and southern Britain. In terms of overall native species-richness there was no significant difference between the exotic and the native stands. In the north, six species groups showed higher values in the exotic Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) stands with the remaining six showing higher values in the native Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) stands. Most notably, lichen species richness was much lower in the exotic stands compared to the native stands, whereas bryophyte and fungal species richness was proportionately higher in the exotic stands. In the south, five species groups (all invertebrate taxa) showed higher species richness in exotic Norway spruce (Picea abies) stands compared to native oak (Quercus robur) stands. Five species groups had higher species-richness in the oak stands, in particular lichens and fungi. It is concluded that emergent ecosystems of exotic conifer species are not irrelevant to biodiversity. Where already well-established they can provide habitat for native species particularly if native woodland is scarce and biodiversity restoration is an immediate priority.
机译:人类行动所产生的新型或新兴生态系统既对生物多样性构成威胁,也带来了机遇。有人提出,外来物种可以通过生境改变来“促进”或“抑制”本土生物多样性。在英国,关于人工针叶树种人工林对生物多样性的贡献的讨论,因为通常认为这些人工林与本地生物多样性的栖息地无关。为了解决这个问题,我们比较了英国北部和南部不同结构阶段的异国和本地林分中各种不同分类组(地衣,苔藓植物,真菌,维管植物,无脊椎动物和鸣鸟)的物种丰富度。就本地物种的总体丰富度而言,外来林和本地林之间没有显着差异。在北部,六个物种组在外来的锡特卡云杉(Picea sitchensis)林分中显示出较高的价值,其余六个物种在本地苏格兰松树(Pinus sylvestris)林中显示出较高的价值。最值得注意的是,与本地林分相比,外来林分的地衣物种丰富度要低得多,而苔藓植物和真菌的丰富度在外来林分中则要高得多。在南部,五种物种组(所有无脊椎动物类群)显示出的挪威云杉(Picea abies)林分相比本地橡木(Quercus robur)林分具有更高的物种丰富度。橡树林中有五个物种组具有较高的物种丰富度,尤其是地衣和真菌。结论是,外来针叶树种的新兴生态系统与生物多样性无关。在已经建立好的地方,它们可以为本地物种提供栖息地,特别是在本地林地稀缺且恢复生物多样性是当务之急的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号