首页> 外文期刊>Behavior Research Methods >Using a runway paradigm to assess the relative strength of rats’ motivations for enrichment objects
【24h】

Using a runway paradigm to assess the relative strength of rats’ motivations for enrichment objects

机译:使用跑道范式评估大鼠富集对象动机的相对强度

获取原文
           

摘要

Laboratory animals should be provided with enrichment objects in their cages; however, it is first necessary to test whether the proposed enrichment objects provide benefits that increase the animals’ welfare. The two main paradigms currently used to assess proposed enrichment objects are the choice test, which is limited to determining relative frequency of choice, and consumer demand studies, which can indicate the strength of a preference but are complex to design. Here, we propose a third methodology: a runway paradigm, which can be used to assess the strength of an animal’s motivation for enrichment objects, is simpler to use than consumer demand studies, and is faster to complete than typical choice tests. Time spent with objects in a standard choice test was used to rank several enrichment objects in order to compare with the ranking found in our runway paradigm. The rats ran significantly more times, ran faster, and interacted longer with objects with which they had previously spent the most time. It was concluded that this simple methodology is suitable for measuring rats’ motivation to reach enrichment objects. This can be used to assess the preference for different types of enrichment objects or to measure reward system processes.
机译:应为实验动物的笼子内提供丰富的物品;但是,首先必须测试提议的浓缩对象是否提供了增加动物福利的好处。当前用于评估提议的富集对象的两个主要范例是选择测试(仅限于确定相对选择频率)和消费者需求研究(可以表明偏好的强度,但设计复杂)。在这里,我们提出了第三种方法:跑道范式,可用于评估动物激发富集对象的动机的强度,比消费者需求研究更易于使用,并且比典型的选择测试更容易完成。在标准选择测试中,与对象花费的时间用于对多个富集对象进行排名,以便与我们的跑道范例中的排名进行比较。老鼠跑了很多次,跑得更快,并且与之前花费最多时间的物体互动的时间更长。结论是,这种简单的方法适用于测量大鼠达到富集对象的动机。这可用于评估对不同类型的富集对象的偏好或衡量奖励系统过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号