首页> 外文期刊>The journal of risk finance >The significance of regulatory orientation, political stability and culture on consumption and price adequacy in insurance markets
【24h】

The significance of regulatory orientation, political stability and culture on consumption and price adequacy in insurance markets

机译:监管方向,政治稳定性和文化对保险市场上的消费和价格充足性的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine insurance regulation theories, regulatory agency structures and measures. Design/methodology/approach - This study investigates significance of regulatory agency structure, key regulatory measures, political stability and cultural dimension in insurance markets of 56 developed and developing countries for 2005-2009. Findings - It was found that insurance consumption is lower in countries with an authority exclusively for insurance regulation but life insurance consumption is higher when the agency is part of government or when another agency is jointly responsible for insurance regulation. Market entry regulation leads to lower consumption whereas market exit regulation has the opposite effect. Solvency regulation and required use of standard forms for insurer financials lead to greater consumption of insurance. A positive impact on the nonlife market is observed for accounting regulation and regulator's intervention power. Practical implications - Price control regulation may lower consumption of insurance whereas tariff rating brings about a rise in the consumption. Regulation of insurance intermediaries or corporate governance may lower insurance consumption whereas the requirement that insurers employ an actuary or actuaries gives rise to the consumption. Originality/value - The author found no difference between OECD and non-OECD countries. However, corruption-freeness and inflation impact insurance consumption. Using OECD country data only, a negative impact was found of the single agency structure and tariff regulation in the life insurance market and a positive impact of regulation by two or more agencies in the life insurance market and of price control regulation in the nonlife insurance market. Corruption-freeness positively affects the loss ratio in the life insurance market and the combined ratio in the nonlife insurance market.
机译:目的-本文的目的是研究保险监管理论,监管机构的结构和措施。设计/方法/方法-这项研究调查了56个发达国家和发展中国家在2005-2009年间保险机构的监管机构结构,关键监管措施,政治稳定性和文化层面的重要性。调查结果-研究发现,在专门负责保险监管的国家中,保险消费量较低,但当该机构为政府部门或另一机构共同负责保险监管时,人寿保险消费较高。市场准入监管导致消费降低,而市场准入监管则相反。偿付能力监管以及要求保险人财务使用标准格式会导致更多的保险消费。会计监管和监管机构的干预能力对非寿险市场产生了积极影响。实际意义-价格控制法规可能会降低保险的消费,而关税税则会导致保险消费的增加。监管保险中介机构或公司治理可能会降低保险消费,而要求保险公司雇用一个或多个精算师的要求会增加消费。原创性/价值-作者发现经合组织国家与非经合组织国家之间没有差异。但是,无腐败和通货膨胀会影响保险消费。仅使用经合组织国家数据,发现对寿险市场中的单一代理机构结构和运价监管产生负面影响,而对两个或多个机构对寿险市场的监管以及对非寿险市场中的价格控制监管产生积极影响。无腐败对人寿保险市场的损失率和非人寿保险市场的综合损失率产生积极影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号