首页> 外文期刊>Australian journal of water resources >Systematic causal inference and knowledge transfer between science and policy: Eco Evidence in water management
【24h】

Systematic causal inference and knowledge transfer between science and policy: Eco Evidence in water management

机译:科学与政策之间的系统因果推理和知识转移:水资源管理中的生态证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Effectively transferring complex scientific ideas into the policy domain is a serious challenge, but an essential one given the important role of science in assessing the implications of a changing climate and resulting water shortages in Australia. Eco Evidence, a method for conducting systematic reviews of the scientific literature using causal criteria analysis, was developed for the eWater Cooperative Research Centre to help bridge this gap between science and policy. It provides a transparent and repeatable method for assessing the strength of the available scientific evidence regarding particular management actions. However, if evidence is used to justify decisions rather than to provide options and likely outcomes of these options to stakeholders, its effectiveness can be undermined. By drawing on interdisciplinary theories of uncertainty in the science-policy arena, this paper demonstrates how Eco Evidence can be used in evidence-based practice in a manner that does not interfere with the effective participation of a range of stakeholders in the decision-making process.
机译:有效地将复杂的科学思想转移到政策领域是一项严峻的挑战,但鉴于科学在评估气候变化和由此造成的澳大利亚水资源短缺的影响中的重要作用,这一挑战至关重要。为eWater合作研究中心开发了Eco Evidence,一种使用因果标准分析进行科学文献系统评价的方法,以帮助弥合科学与政策之间的鸿沟。它提供了一种透明且可重复的方法,用于评估有关特定管理措施的可用科学证据的强度。但是,如果使用证据来证明决策是合理的,而不是向利益相关者提供选择和这些选择的可能结果,则其有效性可能会受到损害。通过利用科学政策领域中不确定性的跨学科理论,本文证明了生态证据如何在不影响众多利益相关者有效参与决策过程的情况下用于循证实践中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号