首页> 外文期刊>Maritime studies >Philippines v China: assessing the implications of the South China Sea arbitration
【24h】

Philippines v China: assessing the implications of the South China Sea arbitration

机译:菲律宾诉中国:评估南海仲裁的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The question concerning the legality of China's nine dash line has been the subject of arbitration proceedings at the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) at The Hague. The case, which was submitted to the PCA by the Philippines for adjudication, raised issues which went beyond the main question concerning the legal status of the dash line as a maritime boundary under United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 provisions. These included, inter alia, complaints concerning China's activities within the area enclosed by the nine dash line, the status of maritime features within the maritime enclosure and alleged environmental damage caused by Chinese dredging and infrastructure-building activities within the contested area. On 12 July 2016 the PCA rendered its judgement on the merits of the case. The main objective of this paper is to critically assess the implications of the PCA's decision for the region and for the international law of the sea.
机译:关于中国的九点划线的合法性的问题一直是海牙常设仲裁法院(PCA)的仲裁程序。此案由菲律宾提交给PCA进行裁决,提出的问题超出了根据1982年《联合国海洋法公约》规定将划线作为海上边界的法律地位的主要问题。除其他外,这些投诉包括有关中国在九个虚线围成的区域内开展活动的投诉,海上围护结构内海事设施的状况以及在争议区域内中国疏ging和基础设施建设活动造成的所谓环境破坏。 PCA于2016年7月12日对案情作出判决。本文的主要目的是批判性地评估PCA裁决对该地区和国际海洋法的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Maritime studies》 |2016年第4期|269-285|共17页
  • 作者

    George K. Ndi;

  • 作者单位

    School of Law, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, West Yorkshire, England, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号