首页> 外文期刊>Australian Journal of International Affairs >Gender, governance and the global political economy
【24h】

Gender, governance and the global political economy

机译:性别,治理与全球政治经济

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article considers a range of governance actors (including also the role of political enquiry into the global political economy in and of itself) to analyse how neo-liberal governance strategies seek to socialise human bodies (female, male or otherwise) into a global system of neo-liberal economic productivity. Contemporary mechanisms of global governance, it is suggested, seek to engineer a capitalist ‘market society’ while claiming to ‘empower’ poor people. In recent years, ‘empowerment’ rhetoric in global governance has increasingly depended on measuring the ‘economic’ role(s) of women in developing countries, judging their contributions productive only where they can be gauged to directly contribute to ‘formal economy’ growth. Reinforcing the assumption that ‘formal’ contributions are the only contributions worth measuring, such rhetoric simultaneously eradicates all other (non-competitive and/or non-entrepreneurial) behavioural possibilities for women, while clearly excluding all those who are not ‘women’. Against the instrumentalisation of gender (as a category pertaining only to women and studies of women), this article argues that gender in global governance means much more than simply describing whether people are male or female and quantifying their productive capacities accordingly. As a broad and complex category of analysis, gender enriches the dynamism both of our studies of and practices in the global political economy. To ignore gender's role in the global political economy is to fail to see the power that gender (as a composite part of the relations of power that drive systems of economic development and growth) brings to our everyday understandings, and especially to our understandings of economic ‘common sense’. View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10357710903460030
机译:本文考虑了一系列治理行为者(包括政治调查本身对全球政治经济的作用),以分析新自由主义治理战略如何寻求将人体(女性,男性或其他)社会化为全球体系新自由主义经济生产力。建议采用当代的全球治理机制,试图打造一个资本主义的“市场社会”,同时宣称“赋予权力”穷人。近年来,“赋权”在全球治理中的言论越来越依赖于衡量发展中国家妇女在经济中的作用,仅在可以衡量她们直接为她们做出贡献的地方判断她们的贡献“正规经济”增长。强化了“正式”贡献是唯一值得衡量的假设,这种言辞同时消除了妇女的所有其他(非竞争性和(或)非企业家)行为可能性,同时显然排除了所有非“正式”贡献的人。 〜妇女。与性别的工具化(仅涉及妇女和妇女研究的类别)相反,本文认为,全球治理中的性别不仅意味着简单地描述人们是男性还是女性,并据此量化其生产能力。作为广泛而复杂的分析类别,性别丰富了我们对全球政治经济学的研究和实践的活力。忽视性别在全球政治经济中的作用,就是看不到性别(作为驱动经济发展和增长系统的权力关系的组成部分)带来的力量带给我们的日常理解,尤其是对经济的理解“常识”。查看全文下载全文相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布时间:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b “};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10357710903460030

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号