首页> 外文期刊>Australian intellectual property journal >Copyright Protection Of Broadcast Program Schedules: Icetv Before The High Court
【24h】

Copyright Protection Of Broadcast Program Schedules: Icetv Before The High Court

机译:广播节目时间表的版权保护:高等法院面前的Icetv

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The appeal to the High Court from the decision of the Full Federal Court in Nine Network v IceTV raises important issues in relation to the subsistence and infringement of copyright in compilations that could be usefully clarified by the court. In particular, the case concerns the extent to which copyright in compilations that include a selection of facts may be infringed by copying the selection. This article identifies and analyses the unresolved issues before the court in the appeal. In doing so, it explains that reversing the decision of the Full Court would mean arriving at fundamentally different conclusions to those reached by the majority of the House of Lords in Ladbroke. The article also explains how denying protection to selections of factual material may undermine incentives for the production of such compilations, suggesting that any changes to the low originality threshold under Australian law should be left to the legislature, and not initiated by the courts.
机译:整个联邦法院在Nine Network诉IceTV一案中对高等法院的上诉提出了与著作权的生存和侵权有关的重要问题,法院可以对这些问题进行有益的澄清。尤其是,此案涉及通过复制所选内容而侵犯包括事实选择在内的汇编中的版权的程度。本文确定并分析了上诉中法院尚未解决的问题。这样做可以说明,推翻最高法院的裁决将意味着得出与拉德布罗克大多数上议院所得出的结论截然不同的结论。文章还解释了拒绝保护事实材料的选择如何破坏制作此类汇编的动机,并建议将澳大利亚法律对低原创性门槛的任何更改留给立法机构,而不是由法院提起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号