...
首页> 外文期刊>Australian Environment Review >Whither forests of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area?
【24h】

Whither forests of the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area?

机译:塔斯马尼亚荒野世界遗产地区的惠特森林?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

As Tim Bonyhady concluded over two decades ago: Forests declared as national parks ... can be stripped of these protections ... Because government cannot be trusted to protect even those areas identified as the common heritage of mankind, conservationists are destined to fight again and again for places they believe worth keeping. The Abbott Government's early approach to World Heritage properties, such as the Great Barrier Reef and Tasmanian forests, demonstrates Professor Bonyhady's foresight. This article briefly explains how Australia has asked the World Heritage Committee of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) to excise forests from the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA), in order to reopen them for forestry. In particular, the article summarises: 1. the addition to the TWWHA of iconic Tasmanian forests World Heritage listed in June 2013; 2. the Abbott government's requested excision of 74,000 ha of these forests in January 2014; 3. the World Heritage Convention process for boundary modification; and 4. the legal consequences of the excision effort.
机译:正如蒂姆·博尼哈迪(Tim Bonyhady)在二十多年前得出的结论:被宣布为国家公园的森林……可以被剥夺这些保护……由于即使是那些被确认为人类共同遗产的地区,政府也无法得到信任,保护主义者注定要再次战斗再一次是他们认为值得保留的地方。雅培政府对大堡礁和塔斯马尼亚森林等世界遗产的早期做法表明了Bonyhady教授的远见卓识。本文简要解释了澳大利亚如何要求联合国教育,科学及文化组织(教科文组织)世界遗产委员会从塔斯马尼亚荒野世界遗产地区(TWWHA)砍伐森林,以便重新开放其林业用途。该文章特别概述:1.在2013年6月列出的塔斯马尼亚森林标志性世界遗产中增加了TWWHA; 2.雅培政府在2014年1月要求砍伐74,000公顷的森林; 3.《世界遗产公约》的界线修改程序; 4.切除工作的法律后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号