首页> 外文期刊>Auditing >Auditor Industry Specialization, Client Bargaining Power, and Audit Pricing
【24h】

Auditor Industry Specialization, Client Bargaining Power, and Audit Pricing

机译:审计师行业专业化,客户议价能力和审计师定价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Porter's (1985) analysis of competitive strategy is used to explain industry specialization by Big 6 accounting firms. In Porter's framework, industry specialization can be viewed as a differentiation strategy whose purpose is to create a sustainable competitive advantage relative to nonspecialist auditors. A differentiation strategy will lead to higher audit fees if valued by clients. We find evidence of higher fees for Big 6 industry specialists relative to nonspecialists in the U.S. audit market, but only for companies in the lower half of the sample based on size (assets < $123 million). By contrast, companies in the upper half of the sample do not pay a specialist premium, and audit fees actually decrease as a company becomes increasingly large relative to its auditor's industry clientele. Together these results suggest that audit fees are higher when clients are small and have little bargaining power, but audit fees are lower when clients have greater bargaining power and this is more likely when companies are large in absolute size and large relative to their auditor's industry clientele.
机译:波特(1985)对竞争策略的分析被用来解释六大会计师事务所的行业专业化。在Porter的框架中,行业专业化可以被视为差异化战略,其目的是相对于非专业审计师建立可持续的竞争优势。如果客户重视,差异化战略将导致更高的审计费用。我们发现有证据表明,六大行业专家相对于美国审计市场中的非专家费用更高,但仅适用于样本规模下半部分的公司(资产<1.23亿美元)。相比之下,样本中上半部分的公司不支付专家保费,并且随着公司相对于其审计师的行业客户而言规模越来越大,审计费用实际上减少了。这些结果加在一起表明,当客户规模较小且议价能力较小时,审计费用较高;而当客户议价能力较大时,审计费用则较低;当公司的绝对规模较大且相对于其审计师行业客户而言,这种可能性更大。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号