首页> 外文期刊>Atomic Energy >COMPARISON OF THE DAMAGE CAUSED TO THE ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH BY NPP AND TPP
【24h】

COMPARISON OF THE DAMAGE CAUSED TO THE ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH BY NPP AND TPP

机译:NPP和TPP对环境和公众健康造成的损害比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The results of a comparative evaluation of the risk to the environment and public health from nuclear power and fossil fuel power plants (natural gas and coal) are presented. The comparison was made in two variants: TPP (coal, gas) and NPP for particular sites and fuel cycles. The first comparison is important for supporting the decisions made by local and regional organs concerning the choice of site and source of energy and the second one is important for developing a strategy for the development of the country's fuel and energy complex. The key danger factors in the fuel-cycle stages (mining raw materials, energy production and waste disposal) were examined: action of atmospheric radioactive and non-radioactive emissions on worker and public health, accidents at NPP and in coal production and green-house gas emissions (CO_2 and methane).
机译:提出了对核电和化石燃料发电厂(天然气和煤炭)对环境和公共健康的风险进行比较评估的结果。比较了两个变体:针对特定场所和燃料循环的TPP(煤,气)和NPP。第一个比较对于支持地方和区域机构在选择地点和能源方面的决定很重要,第二个比较对于制定国家燃料和能源综合体的发展战略很重要。研究了燃料循环阶段(采矿原料,能源生产和废物处置)中的关键危险因素:大气放射性和非放射性排放物对工人和公共卫生的影响,核电厂,煤炭生产和温室事故的发生气体排放(CO_2和甲烷)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Atomic Energy》 |2014年第3期|213-218|共6页
  • 作者单位

    National Research Center Kurchatov Institute, Moscow;

    National Research Center Kurchatov Institute, Moscow;

    National Research Center Kurchatov Institute, Moscow;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:39:21

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号