首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Biodiversity and concentrations of airborne fungi in large US office buildings from the BASE study
【24h】

Biodiversity and concentrations of airborne fungi in large US office buildings from the BASE study

机译:根据BASE研究,美国大型办公楼中空气传播真菌的生物多样性和浓度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Building Assessment Survey and Evaluation (BASE) study measured baseline concentrations of airborne fungi in 100 representative US office buildings in 1994-1998. Multiple samples for different sampling durations, sites, and times of the day were aggregated into building-wide indoor and outdoor average concentrations. Fungal concentrations were compared between locations (indoor vs. outdoor), sampling and analytical methods (culture vs. microscopy), and season (summer vs. winter). The arithmetic means (standard deviations) of the indoor/outdoor concentrations of culturable fungi and fungal spores were 100/680 (230/840) CFU m~(-3) and 270/6540 (1190/6780) spore m~(-3), respectively. Although fewer groups were observed indoors than outdoors, at lower average concentrations (except in two buildings), site-specific and building-wide indoor measurements had higher coefficients of variation. More groups were seen in summer, and aggregated concentrations tended to be higher than in winter except for culturable Aureobasidium spp. and Botrytis spp. outdoors and non-sporulating fungi in both locations. Rankings of the predominant fungi identified by both methods were similar, but overall indoor and outdoor spore concentrations were approximately 3 and 10 times higher, respectively, than concentrations of culturable fungi. In the 44 buildings with both measurements, the indoor and outdoor total culturable fungi to fungal spore ratios (total C/S ratios) were 1.27 and 0.25, with opposite seasonal patterns. The indoor C/S ratio was higher in summer than in winter (1.47 vs. 0.86; N = 29 and 15, respectively), but the outdoor ratio was lower in summer (0.19 vs. 0.36, respectively). Comparison of the number of different fungal groups and individual occurrence in buildings and samples indicated that the outdoor environment and summer season were more diverse, but the proportional contributions of the groups were very similar suggesting that the indoor and outdoor environments were related as were summer and winter seasons for each location. The extreme (e.g., 90th percentile) indoor concentrations (200 CFU m~(-3) and 210 spore m~(-3)) may provide reference values for non-complaint US office environments. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:建筑物评估调查和评估(BASE)研究测量了1994年至1998年美国100座代表性办公楼中空气传播真菌的基线浓度。将不同采样持续时间,地点和一天中不同时间的多个样本汇总到建筑物范围内的室内和室外平均浓度。比较了不同地点(室内与室外),采样和分析方法(培养与显微镜)以及季节(夏季与冬季)之间的真菌浓度。可培养真菌和真菌孢子室内/室外浓度的算术平均值(标准差)为100/680(230/840)CFU m〜(-3)和270/6540(1190/6780)孢子m〜(-3 ), 分别。尽管室内观察到的组比室外少,但是在较低的平均浓度下(除了两栋建筑物外),针对特定地点和整个建筑物的室内测量值具有较高的变异系数。夏季观察到更多的群体,除可培养的金黄担子菌属物种外,总浓度往往高于冬季。和葡萄孢属。户外和两个地区的非孢子菌。两种方法鉴定出的主要真菌的等级相似,但是室内和室外孢子的总浓度分别比可培养真菌的浓度高约3倍和10倍。在这两项测量的44座建筑物中,室内和室外可培养真菌与真菌孢子的总比(总C / S比)分别为1.27和0.25,具有相反的季节性模式。夏天的室内C / S比冬天高(1.47 vs. 0.86; N = 29和15),而夏天的室外C / S比更低(夏天分别为0.19 vs. 0.36)。通过比较建筑物和样本中不同真菌群的数量和个体出现的情况,可以看出室外环境和夏季更加多样化,但是各组的比例贡献非常相似,这表明室内和室外环境与夏季和夏季的相关。每个位置的冬季。室内极端浓度(例如90%百分数)(200 CFU m〜(-3)和210孢子m〜(-3))可能为非投诉美国办公环境提供参考值。由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号