首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Comparison of multi-receptor and single-receptor trajectory source apportionment (TSA) methods using artificial sources
【24h】

Comparison of multi-receptor and single-receptor trajectory source apportionment (TSA) methods using artificial sources

机译:使用人工来源的多受体和单受体轨迹源分配(TSA)方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two trajectory source apportionment methods were tested using an artificially generated data set to determine their ability to detect the known sources. The residence time or conditional probability method developed by Ashbaugh et al. [1985. A residence time probability analysis of sulfur concentrations at Grand Canyon National Park. Atmospheric Environment 19(8), 1263-1270] uses a single receptor at a time, whereas the new multi-receptor (MURA) method developed here uses several receptors at once in an attempt to detect the sources with higher accuracy. The methods were first tested using a simulation with a single source and then with another simulation using four sources. The ability of the methods to detect the sources was quantified for each simulation. The MURA trajectory method proved to be superior at identifying sources for these simulations.
机译:使用人工生成的数据集测试了两种轨迹源分配方法,以确定它们检测已知源的能力。 Ashbaugh等人开发的停留时间或条件概率方法。 [1985年。大峡谷国家公园中硫浓度的停留时间概率分析。大气环境19(8),1263-1270]一次只使用一个接收器,而此处开发的新的多接收器(MURA)方法一次使用多个接收器,以尝试以更高的精度检测源。首先使用一个来源的模拟对方法进行测试,然后使用四个来源的另一个模拟对方法进行测试。对于每种模拟,均定量了该方法检测源的能力。事实证明,MURA轨迹法在识别这些模拟的来源方面具有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号