首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Comparison of air pollutant emissions and household air quality in rural homes using improved wood and coal stoves
【24h】

Comparison of air pollutant emissions and household air quality in rural homes using improved wood and coal stoves

机译:使用改进的木材和煤炉灶比较农村家庭的空气污染物排放量和家庭空气质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Air pollutant emissions, fuel consumption, and household air pollution were investigated in rural Hubei, central China, as a revisited evaluation of an intervention program to replace coal use by wood in gasifier stoves. Measured emission factors were comparable to the results measured two years ago when the program was initiated. Coal combustion produced significantly higher emissions of CO2, CH4, and SO2 compared with wood combustion; however, wood combustion in gasifier stoves had higher emissions of primary PM2.5 (particles with diameter less than 2.5 mu m), Elemental Carbon (EC) and Organic Carbon (OC). In terms of potential impacts on climate, although the use of wood in gasifier stoves produced more black carbon (6.37 vs 910 gCO(2)e per day per capita from coal and wood use) and less SO2 (-684 vs -312), obvious benefits could be obtained owing to greater OC emissions (-15.4 vs -431), fewer CH4 emissions (865 vs 409) and, moreover, a reduction of CO2 emissions. The total GWC100 (Global Warming Potential over a time horizon of 100 years) would decrease by approximately 90% if coal use were replaced with renewable wood burned in gasifier stoves. However, similar levels of ambient particles and higher indoor OC and EC were found at homes using wood gasifier stoves compared to the coal-use homes. This suggests critical investigations on potential health impacts from the carbon-reduction intervention program. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在中国中部的湖北农村,对空气污染物的排放,燃料消耗和家庭空气污染进行了调查,作为对一项干预计划的重新评估,该干预计划取代了气化炉中木材的煤炭消耗。测得的排放因子与两年前启动该计划时测得的结果相当。与木材燃烧相比,煤炭燃烧产生的二氧化碳,甲烷和二氧化硫排放量显着增加。但是,气化炉中的木材燃烧产生的主要PM2.5(直径小于2.5微米的颗粒),元素碳(EC)和有机碳(OC)的排放较高。就对气候的潜在影响而言,尽管在气化炉中使用木材产生的黑碳较多(煤炭和木材使用人均每天6.37比910 gCO(2)e人均)和更少的SO2(-684比-312),由于更大的OC排放量(-15.4对-431),CH4排放量较少(865对409)以及二氧化碳排放量的减少,可以获得明显的收益。如果用气化炉中燃烧的可再生木材代替煤炭,则GWC100(100年全球变暖潜能值)将减少约90%。然而,与燃煤房屋相比,在使用木质气化炉的房屋中发现了相似水平的环境颗粒以及较高的室内OC和EC。这建议对减碳干预计划对健康的潜在影响进行重要调查。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Atmospheric environment》 |2017年第10期|215-223|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China;

    Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China;

    Zhejiang Univ Technol, Coll Environm, Hangzhou 310014, Zhejiang, Peoples R China;

    Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China;

    Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China;

    Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China;

    Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China;

    Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Dept Environm Sci & Technol, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China;

    Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Dept Environm Sci & Technol, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China;

    Jinan Univ, Guangzhou Key Lab Environm Exposure & Hlth, Sch Environm, Guangdong Key Lab Environm Pollut & Hlth, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China;

    Univ Massachusetts, Stockbridge Sch Agr, Amherst, MA 01003 USA;

    Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Field emission testing; Fuel consumption; Wood gasifier stove; Household air pollution; Climate change; Intervention;

    机译:现场排放测试;燃油消耗;木材气化炉;家庭空气污染;气候变化;干预;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:47:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号