首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Evaluation of Bayesian source estimation methods with Prairie Grass observations and Gaussian plume model: A comparison of likelihood functions and distance measures
【24h】

Evaluation of Bayesian source estimation methods with Prairie Grass observations and Gaussian plume model: A comparison of likelihood functions and distance measures

机译:用草原草观测和高斯羽流模型评估贝叶斯源估计方法:似然函数和距离测度的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Source term estimation for atmospheric dispersion deals with estimation of the emission strength and location of an emitting source using all available information, including site description, meteorological data, concentration observations and prior information. In this paper, Bayesian methods for source term estimation are evaluated using Prairie Grass field observations. The methods include those that require the specification of the likelihood function and those which are likelihood free, also known as approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) methods. The performances of five different likelihood functions in the former and six different distance measures in the latter case are compared for each component of the source parameter vector based on Nemenyi test over all the 68 data sets available in the Prairie Grass field experiment. Several likelihood functions and distance measures are introduced to source term estimation for the first time. Also, ABC method is improved in many aspects. Results show that discrepancy measures which refer to likelihood functions and distance measures collectively have significant influence on source estimation. There is no single winning algorithm, but these methods can be used collectively to provide more robust estimates. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:大气扩散的源项估算处理使用所有可用信息(包括站点描述,气象数据,浓度观测值和先验信息)估算排放强度和排放源位置。在本文中,使用草原草场观测对贝叶斯方法进行源项估计。这些方法包括需要规范似然函数的方法和没有似然性的方法,也称为近似贝叶斯计算(ABC)方法。基于Nemenyi检验,对草原草场实验中可用的全部68个数据集,对源参数向量的每个分量,比较了前者中五个不同似然函数的性能和后者情况中六个不同距离度量的性能。首次将几种似然函数和距离度量引入源项估计。而且,ABC方法在许多方面都有改进。结果表明,分别涉及似然函数和距离度量的差异度量对源估计有重大影响。没有单一的获胜算法,但是可以共同使用这些方法来提供更可靠的估计。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号