...
首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical journal >THE DISTANCE TO THE LARGE MAGELLANIC CLOUD CLUSTER NGC 1866 AND THE SURROUNDING FIELD
【24h】

THE DISTANCE TO THE LARGE MAGELLANIC CLOUD CLUSTER NGC 1866 AND THE SURROUNDING FIELD

机译:到大麦哲伦云团NGC 1866的距离和周围的领域

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We use the main-sequence stars in the LMC cluster NGC 1866 and red clump stars in the local field to obtain two independent estimates of the LMC distance. We apply an empirical main-sequence-fitting technique based on a large sample of subdwarfs with accurate Hipparcos parallaxes in order to estimate the cluster distance modulus, and the multicolor red clump method to derive distance and reddening of the LMC field. We find that the main-sequence fitting and the red clump distance moduli are in significant disagreement; the NGC 1866 distance modulus is equal to (m ― M)~(0,NGC 1866) = 18.33 +- 0.08 (consistent with a previous estimate using the same data and theoretical main-sequence isochrones), while the field stars provide (m ― M)_(0,field) = 18.53 +- 0.07. This difference reflects the more general dichotomy in the LMC distance estimates found in the literature. Various possible causes for this disagreement are explored, with particular attention paid to the still uncertain metallicity of the cluster and the star formation history of the field stars.
机译:我们使用LMC星团NGC 1866中的主序星和局部场中的红色团星,以获取LMC距离的两个独立估计。为了估计聚类距离模量,我们基于大量具有精确Hipparcos视差的亚矮样本使用经验主序列拟合技术,并使用多色红色丛方法得出LMC场的距离和变红。我们发现主序列拟合和红色丛集距离模量存在显着差异。 NGC 1866的距离模数等于(m ― M)〜(0,NGC 1866)= 18.33 +-0.08(与之前使用相同数据和理论主序列等时线的估计一致),而场星提供(m ― M)_(0场)= 18.53 +-0.07。这种差异反映了文献中对LMC距离估计的更普遍的二分法。探索了造成这种分歧的各种可能原因,特别注意了团簇的金属性和不确定性以及场星的恒星形成历史。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号