...
首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical journal >THE SURFACE BRIGHTNESS FLUCTUATION SURVEY OF GALAXY DISTANCES. II. LOCAL AND LARGE-SCALE FLOWS
【24h】

THE SURFACE BRIGHTNESS FLUCTUATION SURVEY OF GALAXY DISTANCES. II. LOCAL AND LARGE-SCALE FLOWS

机译:银河系表面的亮度波动调查。二。本地和大型流量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We present results from the Surface Brightness Fluctuation (SBF) Survey for the distances to 300 early-type galaxies, of which approximately half are ellipticals. A modest change in the zero point of the SBF relation, derived by using Cepheid distances to spirals with SBF measurements, yields a Hubble constant Ho = 77 ± 4 ± 7 km s~-1 Mpc~-1, somewhat larger than the HST Key Project result. We discuss how this difference arises from a different choice of zero point, a larger sample of galaxies, and a different model for large-scale flows. Our result is 4/100 larger than found in a recent comparison of the SBF Survey peculiar velocities with predictions derived from the galaxy density field measured by red- shift surveys (Blakeslee et al. 1999b). The zero point of the SBF relation is the largest source of uncer- tainty, and our value for H_o is subject to all the systematic uncertainties of the Key Project zero point, including a 5/100 decrease if a metallicity correction for the Cepheids is adopted. To analyze local and large-scale flows-departures from smooth Hubble flow-we use a parametric model for the distribution function of mean velocity and velocity dispersion at each point in space. These models include a uniform thermal velocity dispersion and spherical attractors whose position, amplitude, and radial shape are free to vary. Our modeling procedure performs a maximum likelihood fit of the model to the observations. Our models rule out a uniform Hubble flow as an acceptable fit to the data. Inclusion of two attractors, one of which having a best-fit location coincident with the Virgo cluster and the other having a fit loca- tion slightly beyond the Centaurus clusters (which we refer to by convention as the Great Attractor), reduces X~2/N from 2.1 to 1.1. The fits to these attractors both have radial profiles such that υ ≈ r~-1 (i.e., isothermal) over a range of overdensity between about 10 and 1, but fall off more steeply at larger radius. The best-fit value for the small-scale, cosmic thermal velocity is 180 ±14 km s~-1. The quality of the fit can be further improved by the addition of a quadrupole correction to the Hubble flow. The dipole velocity offset from the CMB frame for the volume we survey (amplitude ~150 km s~-1) and the quadrupole may be genuine (though weak) manifestations of more distant density fluctuations, but we find evidence that they are more likely due to the inadequacy of spherical models to describe the density profile of the attractors. The residual dipole we find is comparable to the systematic error in these simple, parametrized models; in other words, our survey volume of R < 3000 km s~-1 is, in a mass aver- aged sense, essentially at rest with respect to the CMB. This contradicts claims of large amplitude flows in much larger volumes that include our sample. Our best-fitting model, which uses attenuated power- law mass distributions for the two attractors, has enclosed mass overdensities at the Local Group of 7 × 10~14 M⊙ for the Virgo Attractor and 9 × 10~15 M⊙ for the Great Attractor. Without recourse to information about the overdensities of these attractors with respect to the cosmic mean we cannot provide a good constraint on Ω_M, but our data do give us accurate measurements in terms of δ, the overdensities of the enclosed masses with respect to the background : δΩ_M~2/3 = 0.33 for the Virgo Attrac- tor and δ Ω_M~2/3 = 0.27 for the Great Attractor.
机译:我们提供了从表面亮度波动(SBF)调查到300个早期类型星系的距离的结果,其中大约一半是椭圆形。 SBF关系的零点的适度变化(通过使用造父变星距离进行SBF测量得出的螺旋线得出)产生了哈勃常数Ho = 77±4±7 km s〜-1 Mpc〜-1,比HST键大一点项目成果。我们讨论了这种差异是如何由零点的不同选择,较大的星系样本以及针对大规模流的不同模型产生的。我们的结果比最近的SBF调查特殊速度与通过红移调查测得的银河系密度场的预测结果的比较中发现的结果大4/100(Blakeslee等,1999b)。 SBF关系的零点是最大的不确定性来源,我们的H_o值受关键项目零点的所有系统不确定性的影响,如果采用造父变​​星的金属校正,则其降低5/100。 。为了分析光滑的哈勃流的局部和大规模流,我们对空间中每个点的平均速度和速度弥散的分布函数使用参数模型。这些模型包括均匀的热速度分散和球形吸引子,其位置,振幅和径向形状可以自由变化。我们的建模过程将模型与观测值进行最大似然拟合。我们的模型排除了统一的哈勃流作为对数据的可接受拟合。包括两个吸引子,其中一个吸引子的最佳位置与处女座星团重合,另一个吸引子的位置稍稍超出半人马座星团(根据惯例,我们将其称为“大吸引子”),将其减少X〜2 / N从2.1到1.1。这些吸引子的配合都具有径向轮廓,使得在大约10到1之间的过密度范围内υ≈r〜-1(即等温),但是在较大的半径处下降得更陡。小尺度宇宙热速度的最佳拟合值为180±14 km s〜-1。通过向哈勃流添加四极校正,可以进一步提高拟合质量。对于我们调查的体积(振幅〜150 km s〜-1)和四极子,CMB框架的偶极子速度偏移可能是较远的密度波动的真实(尽管微弱)表现,但我们发现证据表明它们更可能是由于球形模型不足以描述吸引子的密度分布。在这些简单的参数化模型中,我们发现的残留偶极子可与系统误差相媲美。换句话说,从质量平均的角度来看,我们的R <3000 km s〜-1的调查量基本上是相对于CMB静止的。这与包括我们的样本在内的更大体积的大振幅流的主张相矛盾。我们的最佳拟合模型对两个吸引子使用衰减的幂律质量分布,在处女座吸引子的局部组中封闭了质量密度,其密度为7×10〜14M⊙,对于巨无霸则为9×10〜15M⊙吸引人。如果没有求助于这些吸引子相对于宇宙均值的过密度的信息,我们就无法对Ω_M提供良好的约束,但是我们的数据确实提供了关于δ的精确测量值,即相对于背景而言封闭质量的过密度:处女座子的δΩ_M〜2/3 = 0.33,大吸引子的δΩ_M〜2/3 = 0.27。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号