...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian Journal of Technology Innovation >The roles of intermediaries and the development of their capabilities in sectoral innovation systems: a case study of Thailand
【24h】

The roles of intermediaries and the development of their capabilities in sectoral innovation systems: a case study of Thailand

机译:中介机构的角色及其在部门创新系统中的能力发展:以泰国为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper investigates the roles of both public and private intermediaries in the sectoral innovation systems of developing countries by analysing three case studies in the hard disk drive (high-tech sector), automotive (mid-tech sector), and frozen-food (resource-based sector) industries in Thailand. We make three important findings. First, different sectors require different types of intermediaries who play different roles. In the high-tech sector, government research institutes and international industrial associations have gained the trust of transnational corporations (TNCs) and are able to keep pace with rapid technological change. In the mid-tech sector, public-sector development agencies can act as 'brokers' and leverage the knowledge of TNCs to strengthen local suppliers' capabilities, and local industrial associations can act as 'mediators' in solving conflicts between local firms. In resource-based sectors, public sectoral development agencies can act as 'resource providers' to local firms, and local industrial associations can broker coordinated efforts among members to achieve common goals. Second, the division of labour between public and private intermediaries is crucial; public intermediaries should play a leading role in producing the 'public goods' that are necessary to upgrade sectors, whereas private intermediaries should play an active role in producing 'club goods' for the sustainability of sectors. Third, different intermediary roles require different underlying capabilities.
机译:本文通过分析硬盘驱动器(高科技部门),汽车(中等技术部门)和冷冻食品(资源)的三个案例研究,研究了公共和私人中介机构在发展中国家的部门创新系统中的作用。业)。我们得出三个重要发现。首先,不同部门需要扮演不同角色的不同类型的中介机构。在高科技领域,政府研究机构和国际行业协会赢得了跨国公司(TNC)的信任,并能够与快速的技术变革保持同步。在高科技领域,公共部门发展机构可以充当“经纪人”并利用跨国公司的知识来增强本地供应商的能力,而本地行业协会可以充当“调解人”来解决本地公司之间的冲突。在基于资源的部门中,公共部门发展机构可以充当本地公司的“资源提供者”,而本地行业协会可以促成成员之间为达成共同目标而进行的协调努力。第二,公共和私人中介之间的分工至关重要。公共中介机构应在生产升级部门所需的“公共物品”中发挥主导作用,而私人中介机构应在生产“俱乐部商品”以促进部门可持续性方面发挥积极作用。第三,不同的中介角色需要不同的基础功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号