首页> 外文期刊>Asian Journal of Communication >Cultural bias in communication science: challenges of overcoming ethnocentric paradigms in Asia
【24h】

Cultural bias in communication science: challenges of overcoming ethnocentric paradigms in Asia

机译:传播科学中的文化偏见:在亚洲克服民族中心主义范式的挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Americentric biases evident in communication theories cannot be ignored. Many communication theories are hampered by cultural bias, which can ultimately negate their validity. Those theories are deemed empty theories divorced from social reality in Asia. These problems are now recognized and addressed as central, field-defining problems of communication theory. Adding to communication researchers' difficulties, however, is that there is a lack of consensus on many issues. In countering Eurocentric thinking, some Asian scholars reject Western knowledge in toto and attempt to construct theories that are exclusively Asian. This position, however, may fall into the same trap of Eurocentrism which it criticizes. Other Asian scholars have argued against the development of Asiacentric communication theories and propose to modify and adapt existing theories to suit the Chinese (or any other) context. However, this position still falls into the working within the paradigm. To escape the conditioning of Western knowledge, this article highlights the practical relevance and utility of culture-relative theorizing as an alternative discourses in communication research.
机译:传播理论中明显的非中心偏见不容忽视。许多传播理论受到文化偏见的阻碍,最终可能会否定它们的有效性。这些理论被认为是与亚洲社会现实脱节的空洞理论。这些问题现在已被确认并解决为传播理论的中心领域定义问题。然而,使交流研究人员感到困难的是,在许多问题上缺乏共识。在对抗欧洲中心思想时,一些亚洲学者拒绝将西方知识统统纳入,而试图构建完全亚洲的理论。但是,这种立场可能会落入它所批评的欧洲中心主义的陷阱。其他亚洲学者反对以亚洲为中心的传播理论的发展,并提出修改和适应现有理论以适应中国(或任何其他)环境。但是,该位置仍属于范例中的工作。为了逃避西方知识的束缚,本文重点介绍了与文化相关的理论化在交流研究中作为替代性论述的实际意义和实用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号