...
首页> 外文期刊>Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research >Manufacturer's Leasing Channel Management in a Car Supply Chain
【24h】

Manufacturer's Leasing Channel Management in a Car Supply Chain

机译:制造商在汽车供应链中的租赁渠道管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Thanks to the convenient and hassle-free manner of leasing service, the car leasing industry has flourished in recent years. To leverage commercial opportunities, many well-known car manufacturers have chosen to enter the leasing market rather than focus solely on the selling market. An interesting phenomenon is that some manufacturers establish their own leasing departments to gain revenue from the leasing market (referred to as centralization), while other manufacturers conduct their leasing businesses through an autonomous leasing company (referred to as decentralization). In this paper, we propose a game-theoretic model to explore whether a car manufacturer should manage a leasing department in a centralized channel or have the leasing business done by an autonomous company in a decentralized channel. We demonstrate the optimal pricing policy for the manufacturer, dealer, and leasing department/company under both centralization and decentralization. In the main model, we assume that the consumer experience value preference follows a uniform distribution, and leasing brings consumers a better experience value than purchasing, and we normalize the marginal production cost of the product to zero. Our analysis reveals that neither centralization nor decentralization is always optimal, and the related boundary is analyzed. An interesting finding is that as the consumers' leasing experience value rises, the dealer obtains higher profit, even though it serves fewer consumers in the decentralized channel. In the extension, we relax our assumptions to examine the impact of a normal distribution of consumer experience value preferences, a large purchasing experience value, and a non-negligible production cost, and we find that most of the main model results still hold qualitatively.
机译:由于租赁服务的便捷和无忧无虑的方式,近年来汽车租赁行业蓬勃发展。为了利用商业机会,许多知名的汽车制造商已经选择进入租赁市场,而不是仅关注销售市场。有趣的现象是一些制造商建立了自己的租赁部门,以获得租赁市场的收入(称为集中化),而其他制造商通过自主租赁公司(称为权力下放)开展租赁企业。在本文中,我们提出了一种游戏理论模型,探索汽车制造商是否应在集中渠道中管理租赁部门,或者在分散的渠道中拥有自主公司完成的租赁业务。我们展示了制造商,经销商和租赁部/公司在集中化和权力下放下的最佳定价政策。在主模型中,我们假设消费者体验价值优先级遵循均匀分布,租赁将消费者带来比采购更好的经验值,我们将产品的边际生产成本正常化为零。我们的分析表明,既不是既不是最佳的集权,也不是最佳的,并分析相关边界。一个有趣的发现是,随着消费者的租赁经验价值升高,经销商处获得更高的利润,即使它在分散渠道中的消费者少。在延期中,我们放宽我们的假设来检查消费者体验价值偏好的正常分布的影响,大量购买经验价值,以及不可忽略不可忽略的生产成本,并发现大多数主要模型结果仍然保持定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号