首页> 外文期刊>American Sociological Review >Religion and the Construction of Civic Identity
【24h】

Religion and the Construction of Civic Identity

机译:宗教与公民身份的建构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Studies of religion's public roles typically concern the ways in which religious frameworks justify opinions and actions. This article draws from participant-observation research to show how people also use religion to define the boundaries of group identities and relationships. Importantly, people do this in situation-specific ways that we cannot predict from people's religious reasons for public actions. Evidence comes from two religiously-based organizations sponsored by the same local religious coalition, studied during 1998 to 2000 in a midsized U.S. city. One group is an alliance of lay people representing different churches, who organized volunteering and community development projects with a low-income minority neighborhood. The other is an alliance of clergy, representing different churches, that organized public events against racism. In each case, group members used religious terms to argue sharply over civic identity despite sharing the same religious reasons for their goals. Resolving the disputes required redefining or reemphasizing the boundaries of collective identity. The dynamics highlighted in my analyses provide new ways of understanding how people use religion to include or exclude others in civic relationships. Even more broadly, they reveal how religion can enhance or impede collaboration across social status and religious divides. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:对宗教的公共角色的研究通常涉及宗教框架为观点和行为辩护的方式。本文从参与者观察研究中汲取了经验,以展示人们如何也使用宗教来界定群体身份和关系的边界。重要的是,人们以特定于情况的方式来执行此操作,而我们无法根据人们出于宗教原因而采取公共行动的方式来预测。证据来自同一地方宗教联盟赞助的两个宗教组织,该组织于1998年至2000年在美国中型城市中进行了研究。一个团体是由代表不同教会的外行人组成的联盟,他们与低收入少数族裔社区一起组织了志愿者和社区发展项目。另一个是代表不同教会的神职人员联盟,组织了反对种族主义的公共活动。在每种情况下,小组成员都使用宗教用语对公民身份进行激烈辩论,尽管他们出于相同的宗教理由而实现了目标。解决争端需要重新定义或强调集体身份的边界。我的分析中强调的动态因素提供了一种新的方式,可以理解人们如何使用宗教在公民关系中包括或排斥他人。更广泛地说,它们揭示了宗教如何能够增强或阻碍跨越社会地位和宗教分歧的合作。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Sociological Review》 |2008年第1期|p.83-104|共22页
  • 作者

    Paul Lichterman;

  • 作者单位

    Paul LichtermanUniversity of Southern CaliforniaDirect correspondence to Paul Lichterman, Department of Sociology, KAP 352, University of Soutiiern California, 3620 S. Vermont Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90089 (lichterm@usc.edu). A much earlier version of this article was presented at the American Sociological Association meetings in Atlanta, August 2003. For engaged listening and helpful comments, many thanks to Pamela Oliver, Robert Wuthnow, John Evans, Penny Edgell, Nina Eliasoph, David Smilde, Tim Biblarz, anonymous ASR reviewers, the ASR editors Vincent Roscigno, Randy Hodson, Chas Camic, and Franklin Wilson, along with workshop audiences in the Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Center for the Study of Religion, Princeton University. Thanks to the Center for Religion and Civic Culture, University of Southern California, whose grant from Pew Charitable Trusts afforded me time to rework early versions of the article.Paul Lichlerman is currently Associate Professor of Sociology and Religion at the University of Southern California. Much of his research investigates the cultural and social dynamics of volunteer groups, community organizations, and social movements. Recently he has studied religious community-service groups responding to U.S. welfare policy reform. He is the author of The Search for Political Community and Elusive Togetherness: Church Groups Trying to Bridge America's Divisions. He is beginning a project, ultimately cross-national, on how different group styles and public rhetorics circulate in the field of organizations working on housing issues.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号