首页> 外文期刊>American Sociological Review >Bringing Intergenerational Social Mobility Research into the Twenty-first Century: Why Mothers Matter
【24h】

Bringing Intergenerational Social Mobility Research into the Twenty-first Century: Why Mothers Matter

机译:将代际社会流动性研究带入二十一世纪:母亲为何如此重要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Conventional social mobility research, which measures family social class background relative to only fathers' characteristics, presents an outmoded picture of families-a picture wherein mothers' economic participation is neither common nor important. This article demonstrates that such measurement is theoretically and empirically untenable. Models that incorporate both mothers' and fathers' characteristics into class origin measures fit observed mobility patterns better than do conventional models, and for both men and women. Furthermore, in contrast to the current consensus that conventional measurement strategies do not alter substantive research conclusions, analyses of cohort change in social mobility illustrate the distortions that conventional practice can produce in stratification research findings. By failing to measure the impact of mothers' class, the current practice misses a recent upturn in the importance of family background for class outcomes among men in the United States. The conventional approach suggests no change between cohorts, but updated analyses reveal that inequality of opportunity increased significantly for men born since the mid-1960s compared with those born earlier in the century. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:常规的社会流动性研究仅测量与父亲特征相关的家庭社会阶层背景,但呈现的是过时的家庭景象,母亲的经济参与既不普遍也不重要。本文证明,这种测量在理论上和经验上都是站不住脚的。无论是男性还是女性,将母亲和父亲的特征都纳入阶级起源测度的模型比常规模型更能适应观察到的流动性模式。此外,与目前的共识,即传统的衡量策略不会改变实质性研究结论相比,对社会流动性的同类人群变化进行的分析表明,传统实践可能会在分层研究结果中产生扭曲。由于未能衡量母亲阶级的影响,目前的做法错过了美国家庭背景对阶级成就的重要性最近的回升。传统方法表明,队列之间没有变化,但最新分析显示,与本世纪初出生的男性相比,自1960年代中期以来出生的男性机会不平等现象明显增加。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Sociological Review》 |2009年第4期|p.507-528|共22页
  • 作者

    Emily Beller;

  • 作者单位

    Emily BellerU.S. Government Accountability OfficeDirect all correspondence to Emily Beller (ebeller@berkeley.edu). This research was supported by a National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant (0403401). An earlier version this article was presented at the 2007 meeting of the International Sociological Association Research Committee 28 on Social Stratification and Mobility (RC28), Montreal, Canada. I thank Claude Fischer, Harry Ganzeboom, Caroline Hanley, Michael Hout, Jerome Karabel, Sam Lucas, Robert Mare, Donald Treiman, Jane Zavisca, and four anonymous reviewers for helpful comments, advice, and suggestions on this research. The views expressed are solely those of the author and do not represent the views of the U.S. Government Accountability Office.Emily Better received her PhD in 2006 from the University of California-Berkeley Department of Sociology and is currently a Senior Analyst with the U.S. Government Accountability Office, focusing on health issues. Her areas of research interest include social mobility and stratification, families, education, and health and illness.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号