...
首页> 外文期刊>Artificial Life >A Category Theoretical Argument against the Possibility of Artificial Life: Robert Rosen's Central Proof Revisited
【24h】

A Category Theoretical Argument against the Possibility of Artificial Life: Robert Rosen's Central Proof Revisited

机译:反对人工生命可能性的分类理论论证:罗伯特·罗森的核心论证再探

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of Robert Rosen's main contributions to the scientific community is summarized in his book Life itself. There Rosen presents a theoretical framework to define living systems; given this definition, he goes on to show that living systems are not realizable in computational universes. Despite being well known and often cited, Rosen's central proof has so far not been evaluated by the scientific community. In this article we review the essence of Rosen's ideas leading up to his rejection of the possibility of real artificial life in silico. We also evaluate his arguments and point out that some of Rosen's central notions are ill defined. The conclusion of this article is that Rosen's central proof is wrong.
机译:罗伯特·罗森(Robert Rosen)对科学界的主要贡献之一总结在他的《生命本身》一书中。罗森提出了定义生命系统的理论框架。给定这个定义,他继续表明,生命系统在计算宇宙中是无法实现的。尽管已广为人知并经常被引用,但Rosen的核心证明到目前为止尚未得到科学界的评估。在本文中,我们回顾了罗森的思想的实质,这些思想导致了罗森对计算机模拟现实生活的可能性的拒绝。我们还评估了他的论点,并指出罗森的一些中心概念定义不清。本文的结论是罗森的核心证明是错误的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Artificial Life》 |2006年第1期|117-134|共18页
  • 作者

    Chu D; Ho W;

  • 作者单位

    Computing Laboratory, University of Kent, CT2 7NF Canterbury, United Kingdom D.F.Chu@kent.ac.uk;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号