首页> 外文期刊>Artificial intelligence in medicine >Logical properties of foundational relations in bio-ontologies
【24h】

Logical properties of foundational relations in bio-ontologies

机译:生物本体基础关系的逻辑性质

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: We compare the advantages of specifying the semantics of foundational relations in bio-medical terminology systems using different types of formal deductive systems: first-order logic (FOL) and description logics (DLs). Method: As our focus example, we use a terminology whose basic terms are supposed to designate proper parthood relations, subdivision relations, and surrounded-by relations. Each type of relation captures an important and distinct aspect of the spatial organization of anatomical structures: the general part-whole structure (proper parthood), the division of salient anatomical objects into discrete, tree-like structures (subdivision-of), and the nesting of anatomical objects into containers (surrounded-by). We show that all three types of relations are strict partial orderings (i.e., asymmetric and transitive). Ontologies whose purpose is to specify the semantics of terms referring to these types of relations must include axioms strong enough to formally distinguish among them. We compare the extent to which axioms characterizing proper parthood, subdivision, and surrounded-by relations can be represented in first-order logic and various description logics. Conclusions: The development of bio-medical ontologies requires a rigorous formal analysis of foundational relations. Different kinds of formal tools may be used in this process. Ideally, an analysis in a highly expressive language, such as first-order logic, should be worked out in conjunction with analyses in less expressive but computationally tractable deductive systems such as description logics.
机译:目的:我们比较使用不同类型的形式演绎系统(一阶逻辑(FOL)和描述逻辑(DL))在生物医学术语系统中指定基本关系语义的优势。方法:作为我们的焦点示例,我们使用的术语的基本术语应该用来指定适当的分身关系,细分关系和包围关系。每种类型的关系都捕获了解剖结构空间组织的重要且独特的方面:一般的整体结构(适当的局部性),显着的解剖对象划分为离散的树状结构(细分),以及将解剖对象嵌套到容器中(环绕)。我们证明了所有三种关系都是严格的偏序(即不对称和可传递)。旨在指定引用这些类型关系的术语语义的本体必须包含足够强大的公理,以正式区分它们。我们比较了可以用一阶逻辑和各种描述逻辑表示表征适当的分手,细分和包围关系的公理的程度。结论:生物医学本体论的发展需要对基础关系进行严格的正式分析。在此过程中可以使用不同形式的正式工具。理想情况下,应该与诸如表述逻辑之类的低表达性但在计算上难以处理的演绎系统中的分析相结合,以一种具有高表达性的语言(如一阶逻辑)进行分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号