首页> 外文期刊>Arthritis & Rheumatism >Treatment of polyarteritis nodosa and microscopic polyangiitis without poor-prognosis factors: A prospective randomized study of one hundred twenty-four patients
【24h】

Treatment of polyarteritis nodosa and microscopic polyangiitis without poor-prognosis factors: A prospective randomized study of one hundred twenty-four patients

机译:无不良预后因素的结节性多发性动脉炎和镜下性多发性血管炎的治疗:一项对124位患者的前瞻性随机研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy of systemic corticosteroids alone as first-line treatment of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) without poor-prognosis factors as defined by the Five-Factors Score (FFS), and to compare the efficacy and safety of azathioprine versus pulse cyclophosphamide as adjunctive immunosuppressive therapy for patients experiencing treatment failure or relapse.MethodsThis prospective, multicenter, therapeutic trial included 124 patients with newly diagnosed PAN or MPA (FFS of 0) treated with corticosteroids alone. At the time of treatment failure or disease relapse, patients were randomized to receive 6 months of therapy with oral azathioprine or 6 pulses of cyclophosphamide. Analyses was performed according to an intent-to-treat strategy.ResultsThe mean ± SD followup period was 62 ± 33 months. Treatment with corticosteroids alone induced remission in 98 patients; 50 (40%) of these patients had sustained disease remission, 46 (37%) experienced a relapse, and 2 became corticosteroid dependent (daily prednisone dose ≥20 mg). In 26 patients (21%), treatment with corticosteroids alone failed, and 49 patients (40%) required additional immunosuppression. Among the 39 patients randomized, 13 of 19 achieved remission with cyclophosphamide pulses, and 14 of 20 achieved remission with azathioprine. Among all patients, the 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 99% and 92%, respectively. Six deaths occurred in the cyclophosphamide-treated group compared with 2 deaths in the azathioprine-treated group. Disease-free survival was significantly lower for patients with MPA than for those with PAN (P = 0.046).ConclusionFor patients with PAN or MPA with an FFS of 0, overall 5-year survival was good, but first-line corticosteroid treatment was able to achieve and maintain remission in only about half of the patients, and 40% of the patients required additional immunosuppressive therapy. Azathioprine or pulse cyclophosphamide was fairly effective for treating corticosteroid-resistant disease or major relapses.
机译:目的评估全身性皮质类固醇单独作为一线治疗结节性多发性动脉炎(PAN)和镜下性多发性血管炎(MPA)的临床疗效,且无五因素评分(FFS)定义的不良预后因素,并比较其疗效和安全性方法这项前瞻性,多中心,治疗性试验包括124名新诊断为PAN或MPA(FFS为0)的单独使用皮质类固醇激素治疗的患者,作为辅助免疫抑制治疗。在治疗失败或疾病复发时,患者被随机分配接受口服硫唑嘌呤或6脉冲环磷酰胺治疗6个月。根据意向性治疗策略进行分析。结果平均±SD随访期为62±33个月。仅用皮质类固醇激素治疗可缓解98例患者;这些患者中有50(40%)持续病情缓解,有46(37%)复发,另有2例依赖皮质类固醇(每日泼尼松剂量≥20 mg)。在26例患者(21%)中,仅使用糖皮质激素治疗失败,而49例患者(40%)需要额外的免疫抑制。在随机分配的39例患者中,19例中有13例通过环磷酰胺脉冲缓解,20例中有14例通过硫唑嘌呤缓解。在所有患者中,1年和5年生存率分别为99%和92%。环磷酰胺治疗组有6例死亡,而硫唑嘌呤治疗组有2例死亡。结论MPA患者无病生存率显着低于PAN患者(P = 0.046)。结论对于FFS为0的PAN或MPA患者,其总体5年生存率良好,但一线皮质类固醇激素治疗可以仅在大约一半的患者中达到和维持缓解,并且40%的患者需要额外的免疫抑制治疗。硫唑嘌呤或脉冲环磷酰胺对于治疗抵抗皮质类固醇激素的疾病或严重复发相当有效。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Arthritis & Rheumatism》 |2010年第4期|p.1186-1197|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France;

    |Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France;

    Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France;

    Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France;

    Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France;

    Hôpital du Mans, Le Mans, France;

    Hôpital d'Iinstruction des Armées Sainte-Anne, Toulon, France;

    Center Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France;

    Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Côte-de-Nacre, Caen, France;

    Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Côte-de-Nacre, Caen, France;

    Hôpital Louis-Pradel, Lyon, France;

    |Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号