首页> 外文期刊>Arthritis & Rheumatism >Clinical efficacy and safety of etanercept versus sulfasalazine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A randomized, double-blind trial?
【24h】

Clinical efficacy and safety of etanercept versus sulfasalazine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A randomized, double-blind trial?

机译:依那西普与柳氮磺胺吡啶在强直性脊柱炎患者中的临床疗效和安全性:一项随机,双盲试验?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Etanercept, a fully human tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor, is an effective treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Sulfasalazine is frequently used for the treatment of both axial symptoms and peripheral symptoms of AS, and it has been the recommended therapy before the use of an anti-TNF agent when peripheral arthritis is present. Until now, no clinical trial has compared the efficacy and safety of a TNF blocker with that of sulfasalazine. This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of etanercept with that of sulfasalazine after 16 weeks of treatment in patients with axial and peripheral manifestations of AS.
机译:Etanercept是一种完全的人类肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)受体,是强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者的有效治疗方法。柳氮磺吡啶经常用于AS的轴向症状和周围症状的治疗,并且当存在周围关节炎时,在使用抗TNF药物之前,推荐使用柳氮磺吡啶。迄今为止,尚无临床试验可将TNF阻滞剂与柳氮磺胺吡啶的功效和安全性进行比较。这项研究旨在比较依那西普与柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗16例AS轴向和外周表现患者的疗效和安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号