首页> 外文期刊>Armed Forces & Society >The Effectiveness of Military Governments during War: The Case of Argentina in the Malvinas Francisco
【24h】

The Effectiveness of Military Governments during War: The Case of Argentina in the Malvinas Francisco

机译:战争期间军事政府的效力:以马尔维纳斯·弗朗西斯科的阿根廷为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The concept of "remarkable trinity" has been one of the main tools used to study warfare. But what happens when one of three actors that compose it is not in place? This is what occurred in Argentina when its military took the Malvinas Islands in 1982. The war against Great Britain was, indeed, not run by civilians. A study of this war shows how harmful this phenomenon could be. First, the involvement of the officership in politics tends to corrupt professionalism—causing lack of discipline and the loss of the officer-ship's expertise. Second, soft power also seems to play a role. The fact that the military was governing Argentina discredited the country's claims, although Washington had good reasons to remain neutral during the conflict. Finally, some of the most important strategic mistakes made by the Argentines during the war—including the time of the invasion—might have been avoided by the presence of a civilian authority.
机译:“显着的三位一体”概念一直是研究战争的主要工具之一。但是,如果组成它的三个参与者之一不在位,会发生什么?这就是阿根廷军队于1982年占领马尔维纳斯群岛时发生的情况。与英国的战争确实不是由平民进行的。对这场战争的研究表明,这种现象可能有多么有害。首先,军官参与政治往往会破坏职业素养,这会导致缺乏纪律和军官专业知识的流失。其次,软实力似乎也发挥了作用。尽管华盛顿有充分的理由在冲突期间保持中立,但军方统治阿根廷的事实使该国的主张蒙羞。最终,由于民事当局的存在,可以避免阿根廷人在战争中犯下的一些最重要的战略错误,包括入侵时期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号