...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology >A survey of neuropsychologists’ beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort
【24h】

A survey of neuropsychologists’ beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort

机译:对神经心理学家关于努力评估的信念和实践的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The current study investigated neuropsychologists’ beliefs and practices with respect to assessing effort and malingering by surveying a sample of NAN professional members and fellows (n=712). The results from 188 (26.4percnt;) returned surveys indicated that 57% of respondents frequently included measures of effort when conducting a neuropsychological evaluation. While a majority of respondents (52%) rarely or never provide a warning that effort indicators will be administered, 27% of respondents often or always provide such a warning. The five most frequently used measures of effort or response bias were the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), MMPI-2 F–K ratio, MMPI-2 FBS, Rey 15-item test, and the California Verbal Learning Test. However, the TOMM, Validity Indicator Profile, Word Memory Test, Victoria Symptom Validity Test, and the Computerized Assessment of Response Bias were rated as most accurate for detecting suboptimal effort. These results and other findings are presented and discussed.
机译:本研究通过调查NAN专业成员和研究人员(n = 712)的样本,调查了神经心理学家在评估努力和恶意方面的信念和实践。 188(26.4percnt;)返回的调查结果表明,进行神经心理学评估时,有57%的受访者经常包括努力的量度。尽管大多数受访者(52%)很少或从不警告将对努力指标进行管理,但27%的受访者经常或始终提供这样的警告。五个最常用的努力或反应偏见的度量是记忆障碍测试(TOMM),MMPI-2 F-K比,MMPI-2 FBS,Rey 15项测试和加利福尼亚语言学习测试。但是,TOMM,有效性指标描述,单词记忆测试,维多利亚症状有效性测试和响应偏差的计算机评估被认为是检测次优努力最准确的方法。这些结果和其他发现进行了介绍和讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号