...
首页> 外文期刊>Architecture Bulletin >A trail of heritage destruction
【24h】

A trail of heritage destruction

机译:遗产破坏的踪迹

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Attending the DOCOMOMO international conference in Ljubljana last September served to reinforce my concerns that modern architectural heritage is still not well protected in NSW. This is not for lack of trying, nor is it for lack of legislation. Attempts to heritage list the Sirius building have highlighted where the problem lies. The NSW Heritage Council unanimously supported the heritage listing. As the government sought income from the sale of the site, the listing was rejected. As the Save our Sirius campaign has pointed out the tailored advice supporting the refusal did not tally with the views of any of leading expert bodies. This is not the first time that the minister has refused to include a twentieth century item on the state heritage register (SHR). Not taking the view of expert bodies is not confined to the built heritage, and is one of the issues that have come to light during investigations into the Murray-Darling environmental catastrophe.
机译:去年9月参加在卢布尔雅那(Ljubljana)举行的DOCOMOMO国际会议使我更加担心现代建筑遗产在新南威尔士州仍未得到很好的保护。这不是因为没有尝试,也不是因为缺乏立法。尝试将Sirius建筑物列为遗产的做法突显了问题所在。新南威尔士州遗产委员会一致支持遗产名录。由于政府从出售土地中获得收入,上市被拒绝了。正如“拯救我们的小天狼星”运动指出的那样,支持拒绝的量身定制的建议与任何领先的专家机构的观点都不符。这不是部长第一次拒绝将20世纪的遗产列入国家遗产登记册(SHR)。不采纳专家机构的观点并不仅仅局限于已建成的遗产,这是在对默里达令环境灾难进行调查时发现的问题之一。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Architecture Bulletin》 |2019年第1期|26-27|共2页
  • 作者

    Noni Boyd;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号