首页> 外文期刊>Architectural theory review >RETHINKING INDIAN MODERNITY FROM THE MARGINS: ARCHITECTURAL POLITICS IN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN THE 1970S
【24h】

RETHINKING INDIAN MODERNITY FROM THE MARGINS: ARCHITECTURAL POLITICS IN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN THE 1970S

机译:重新审视印度的现代性:1970年代,蒂鲁文南塔布勒姆(Thiruvananthapuram)的建筑政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper interprets the context and implications of a little-known but consequential ideological feud that emerged between rival "regionalist" and "modernist" camps of architectural practitioners in the south Indian state of Kerala in the 1970s. Beginning with a comparative analysis of the private residences of the key protagonists-the expatriate British Gandhian, Laurie Baker, and J. C. Alexander, an influential modernist and doyen of the architectural profession in post-independence Kerala-the paper explores the contrasting views of both camps as they debated the idea of the modern house. Turning to the architectural historiography of modern India, the over-representation of one camp and the relative invisibility of the other is then examined in the context of the radical cultural and political climate of the 1970s in Kerala. The paper considers how Baker's rise to wider recognition and impact by the end of the 1970s can be understood only by understanding the "author function" that Baker satisfied in Kerala society. The paper concludes that the complex network of influences and actors that appear in this specific case study, drawn from the assumed margins of India's modern architectural history, makes the case for a flatter ontology of history, rejecting the existing "diffusion" model and enabling buildings and context to speak in equal measure.
机译:本文解释了1970年代在印度南部喀拉拉邦的建筑从业者的对立的“区域主义者”和“现代主义者”阵营之间出现的鲜为人知但随之而来的意识形态斗争的背景和含义。首先,对主要主人公的私人住所进行比较分析,这些私人主人是外籍英国人Gandhian,Laurie Baker和JC Alexander,这是独立后喀拉拉邦有影响力的现代主义者和建筑行业的传统-本文探讨了两个营地的对比观点当他们辩论现代房屋的想法时。回到现代印度的建筑史学,然后在1970年代喀拉拉邦激进的文化和政治气候的背景下,考察了一个营地的过多代表和另一个营地的相对隐蔽性。本文认为,只有通过了解贝克在喀拉拉邦社会中所满足的“作者功能”,才能理解贝克在1970年代末所获得的广泛认可和影响。本文的结论是,此特定案例研究中出现的复杂的影响和参与者网络,是从印度现代建筑历史的假定边缘得出的,为历史的本体论提供了平坦的理由,拒绝了现有的“扩散”模型和使建筑物和环境能够平等地说话。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号