首页> 外文期刊>Architectural science review >Passive house vs. passive design: sociotechnical issues in a practice-based design research project for a low-energy house
【24h】

Passive house vs. passive design: sociotechnical issues in a practice-based design research project for a low-energy house

机译:被动房子与被动设计:用于低能量房屋的实践设计研究项目中的社会科技问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Building performance simulation tools such as the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) can be invaluable for improving energy-efficiency in housing design. However, achieving improved energy performance is also a sociotechnical issue, and how this is dealt with during the architectural design process seems less well studied. This collaborative design research project for a low-energy prefab house with an industry partner, a manufacturer of Structural Insulated Panels (SIP), is used as a case study to show that it is possible to achieve high energy performance while addressing specific socio-technical concerns within an Australian volume homebuilding market. A key issue that emerged in this project was the perceived tension between passive design expectations in Australia and those promoted through the Passive House software tool.
机译:建筑性能仿真工具,如被动房屋规划包(PHPP)可以为提高住房设计中的能效而非常宝贵。然而,实现了改善的能源性能也是社会技术问题,以及如何在建筑设计过程中处理这似乎不太好。这一合作设计研究项目,为一个带有行业合作伙伴的低能量预制房屋,由行业合作伙伴,结构绝缘板(SIP)的制造商被用作案例研究,以表明可以在解决特定的社会技术时实现高能量性能澳大利亚商业商业市场内的担忧。在该项目中出现的一个关键问题是澳大利亚被动设计期望之间的感知紧张,通过被动房屋软件工具促进的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号