SET A UNIFYING VISION FOR THE THAMES GATEWAY

摘要

Historically, the Thames Estuary has always been the centre of British government. Before London, the capital was Colchester, with Essex as its hincerland.The estuary became die centre for exploration and building of empire from Greenwich (Britain's equivalent of Versailles), to the naval dockyards at Chatham. During the nineteenth century, it became more of a focus for docks and overseas trade, and in the Victorian era the estuary was used for leisure and recreation, with paddle steamers plying up and down to Southend, Erith and other piers and promenades. It was London's seaside but, by the early to mid-twentieth century being at the city's eastern extremity, the prevailing winds brought pollution, and it became host to sewage farms, waste disposal sites and power stations. Coupled with the decline of the docks, by the end of the twentieth century the estuary was a sad and despoiled place, yet there are still many areas of great natural beauty, particularly the wildlife of the wetlands.rnToday, the Thames Gateway has become the focus of a Labour political initiative and has been declared Europe's largest regeneration area. But this actually capitalises on the Thatcher government's vision, and particularly that of the then Environment Secretary, Michael Heseltine. for, initially, the immediate docklands area, but subsequently the route of the Channel Tunnel Rail Link along the east Kent coast and up through the estuary.Yet, though it was Heseltine who coined the name,Thames Gateway, the way that planning culture has evolved means there is no single organising idea that holds together this ambitious and large-scale regeneration project (the area is vast, up to 40-50km in length).rnSince to date no tangible connection has been identified between the two estuary edges of Essex and Kent, or the east-west linking of London to the English Channel, the underlying ambition is not a regional or town planning one. rather it is economic.This is expressed in terms of numbers of housing stock and economic indicators such as inward investment, numbers employed and unemployed and new jobs created. Also, due to the so-called democratisation of planning, there has been a proliferation of agencies which encourage consultation and bottom-up involvement, but there is no top-down leadership and no vision.To use an analogy - there is no picture on the jigsaw puzzle box. everyone has to work it out for themselves.