首页> 外文期刊>Architectural Research Quarterly >Exploring The Social And Political are Architects Still Relevant To Architecture?
【24h】

Exploring The Social And Political are Architects Still Relevant To Architecture?

机译:探索社会和政治建筑师是否仍然与建筑有关?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

'Alternate Currents', held in Sheffield's Showroom Cinema in late November, set out to politicise architectural practice. Part of an AHRC-funded project on alternative architectural practices, it was convened by the University of Sheffield's Tatjana Schneider and Jeremy Till (whose introduction follows this report). The event was an invitation to go beyond the normative, specifically by'dealing with architecture's economic, political and social dimensions. Although it was mixed in all respects, for me, trained in social anthropology, two issues emerged as particularly interesting. First, how might architects weighed down by a political conscience as well as by the usual professional demands, conceptualise the mutual entanglements between the built environment and social organisation? This is no trivial question.
机译:11月下旬在谢菲尔德(Sheffield)的Showroom Cinema举行的“ Alternate Currents”开始将建筑实践政治化。这是AHRC资助的替代建筑实践项目的一部分,由谢菲尔德大学的Tatjana Schneider和Jeremy Till召集(其介绍在本报告之后)。此次活动邀请人们超越规范,特别是通过“处理建筑的经济,政治和社会层面”。尽管它在各个方面都参差不齐,但对我而言,他们接受过社会人类学的培训,但出现了两个特别有趣的问题。首先,建筑师如何在政治良知和通常的专业要求的压力下,将建筑环境与社会组织之间的相互纠缠概念化?这不是小问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号